Relational responding is the process of responding to one stimulus or event in light of another. changes in stimulus functions Based on how a stimulus interacts with other inputs, a person's response to a stimulus can be altered or transformed.
Relational responding, also known as a relational reaction, occurs when an organism responds to a stimulus without taking into account the situational context, instead acting as though it were in response to another stimulus. When stimuli are related to one another, relational responding takes place, and conditioning may result from the associations that result from the relating of the stimuli.
A relational response example is provided in a paper by Ian Stewart and John McElwee. When the colour red is used, an animal is taught to select a vertical line, and when the colour green is used, it selects a horizontal line. Vertical-red and Horizontal-green are the two unidirectional relational responses that result from this. By linking the stimuli and reacting in accordance with the relationship, this association results.
Learn more about Relational responding here
brainly.com/question/3808494
#SPJ4
As the director of a restorative justice program in your community, you should NOT care if the juvenile is innocent or not given that the program is restorative, not punitive.
Even though there may be no evidence and the juvenile and his lawyer maintain his innocence, the program is put in place to help juveniles with obtaining job training, educational skills, and other programs that can enrich the youths life in major ways.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
Answer:
Um, hell yeah. What Penn did is homocide. Cold-blooded murder. That's a crime.
1. Because wonder woman is perceived as a strong and heroic figure, which is very rare depiction on female characters.
Most of other female characters that we see in either fictional or historical books would depict a weak and feminine individuals that invited other people to protect them
2. I believe the answer would be no.
I'm not saying that the quote is not based on valid argument. But the myth is aimed to tackle the public perception that most women are women, lack of force, and non heroic.
The quote on the other hand only act as a response to coping mechanism from the pre-existing perception.
3. Because female on average are much more caring in term of facing social issues compared to male on average.
This would most likely create a society where all the poor are taken care of and all the social issues that exist within the society would be addressed properly.
4. I think it's because of the counter reaction of actual Athenian history that dominated by Men.
In real athenian society, women would have no role beside taking care of children and household, and the Amzonian story reflect the wasted potential of women in such society.
