1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andre45 [30]
3 years ago
9

In the space provided, explain the pros and cons of the Articles of Confederation as they pertain to national and state economic

s.
History
2 answers:
Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
5 0
It gave more rights. it gave the government less power
Nikolay [14]3 years ago
5 0

The Articles of Confederation had several pros and cons to it. For one it gave more rights to the people and less power to the government. A couple of pros to the Articles of Confederation are tt offered the first chance to experience unity, it gave the colonies a chance to go global, it allows for colonists to still experience free movement, it encouraged trade, it required complete agreement to make changes to it. Where as some of the cons are more serious and to list some: It took a long time for it to be fully implemented, it had no authority to regulate commerce, it had not authority to levy taxes, it had not authority to levy taxes, it placed value on slavery, and it restricted the ability to act in an emergency. Therefore the Articles of Confederation was a good point to start off on and improve on, but not fit to rule a country.

You might be interested in
What is one way the media can influence a political election?
UNO [17]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

By voting for or against candidates in an election

7 0
2 years ago
Ciri-ciri keistimewaan seni bina kerajaan Angkor
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

Angkor wat dua rancangan pokok arsitektur Candi Khmer ,yakni rancangan Candi gunungan Dan rancangan Candi berserambi

8 0
3 years ago
Can some on please compare and contrast the independence movements of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
BARSIC [14]
I can do Australia and New Zealand but not Canada

<span>Australia was made up of separate colonies scattered around the continent. Britain agreed to Australian demands for self-rule. The colonies united into the independent Commonwealth of Australia. Britain annexed New Zealand. As colonists poured in, the took more and more land, leading to fierce wars with Maori. Many Maori died. New Zealanders wanted self-rule and won independence.</span>






4 0
3 years ago
From the 16th to the early 20th century, the imperial powers competing for influence and control in Asia included
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

I am currently unable to answer this question at this specific moment in time.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Correct answer please ​
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer: D but if I'm wrong let me know

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was regionalism a political problem for Latin America?
    12·2 answers
  • Select the two TRUE statements: Libraries are the sole responsibility of the federal government. Making mass transportation avai
    15·2 answers
  • In order to override a presidential veto, Congress must pass the bill again, but this time with a super majority. This means tha
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following men ran as a strong third party president canidates in 1992 and 1<br> 996
    9·1 answer
  • What was the primary way the farms in the South differed from those in the North?​
    10·1 answer
  • In which form of government is the opportunity for citizen involvement the highest?
    5·1 answer
  • What changes were made to Japan's politicial systems after the war ended
    8·1 answer
  • How was the Industrial Revolution similar and/or different in other regions compared to Great Britain?
    15·1 answer
  • Plzz help giving brainlest
    5·1 answer
  • How fast was caesars bridge built
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!