1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
3 years ago
9

What were the arguments for and against Indian removal

History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
8 0
The argument for:
The fact that someone wanted the land they were on. They were making very good use to it prior to their removal. But some whites wanted land because they couldn't make a profit from it.

argument against:

They were their first and had a prior claim.
stich3 [128]3 years ago
5 0

First, they argued that the white Americans (and their black slaves) needed the land and could make better use of it.  They argued that Americans could make the land more economically productive than the Indians had been able to.  Second, the proponents argued from the idea of white superiority.  They argued that the Indians were inferior and that it was not necessary to treat them fairly.


You might be interested in
Which was a reaction to the PLEASE HELP FAST Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854?
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

I think it’s D, if not then it’s C .

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Greece's many hills were important to early Greek city-states because they:
kiruha [24]

Answer:

D. allowed Greece to trade with other countries

A. isn't correct because each of Greek city-states were independent meaning that the Greek leaders weren't forced to make a United government

B. isn't correct because the hills have nothing to do with that war with Grace

C. isn't correct because it was hard for the Greek to farm with the Hills

so D. is the correct answer because they were able to trade easily with other countries because of their Hills and city-states

( I hope this helped answering your question! have a wonderful day everyone!)

:)

8 0
3 years ago
URGENT PLEASE HELP!!!
Arte-miy333 [17]
The response is: D)railroad
6 0
3 years ago
Who were the christians that cabeza de vaca met near the gulf of California
Sloan [31]

Answer:

The christians that Cabeza de Vaca met were spaniards in the lands of New Spain (Modern-day Mexico).

Explanation:

Álvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca and other men explored American southwhest meeting many american tribes in what is now the states of Florida, Texas, California and Mexico, among others. His expedition was filled with difficulties since the very beginning. There were very few companions with him when they met some spaniards near the gluf of California. They were found in the lands of New Spain (Now Mexico) and the they were  sent to Mexico City where they could sail back to Europe.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek ceded more than ___________ of Choctaw land to the state of Mississippi.
Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

A-7.5 million acres

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What made the germans create the Nuremburg Law?
    10·1 answer
  • Who is cm punk married 2?
    5·2 answers
  • What did the Sedition Act 1918 say?
    13·1 answer
  • How was the three-Firth’s compromise like the great compromise ?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a method used by state governments to
    15·1 answer
  • President's way of bypassing congress when making a law
    12·1 answer
  • What steps has the international community taken to address humanitarian crises throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centur
    6·1 answer
  • 2. What type of democracy is where people govern themselves by voting on all issues
    15·1 answer
  • What two plans did the United States implement to combat the spread of communism?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the United States respond to Iraqi aggression?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!