What were the arguments for and against Indian removal

2 answers:

8 0

The argument for:
The fact that someone wanted the land they were on. They were making very good use to it prior to their removal. But some whites wanted land because they couldn't make a profit from it.

argument against:

They were their first and had a prior claim.

stich3 [128]3 years ago

5 0

First, they argued that the white Americans (and their black slaves) needed the land and could make better use of it. They argued that Americans could make the land more economically productive than the Indians had been able to. Second, the proponents argued from the idea of white superiority. They argued that the Indians were inferior and that it was not necessary to treat them fairly.

You might be interested in

The following Crusade resulted in the conquest by Western Christians of Constantinople, a Christian city:

bulgar [2K]

Answer:

The Fourth Crusade

Explanation:

wikipedia

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE

Ksju [112]

Answer:

The United Nations had NATO troops bomb Yugoslavia, in the NATO bombing of 1999.

3 0

3 years ago

Describe and account for the changes in the American presidency between 1960 and 1975, as symbolized by Kennedy’s “Camelot”, Joh

aev [14]

Following World war 11 the presidency was vastly altered. Power necessitated a redefinition of the rule of chief executive for a growing government. High office shifted multiple times from 1960 to 1975. Through the usage of new communication technologies which formed an increased sense of intimacy and also advocated idealistic reforms which meant to glorify progress to the great which is unknown.

Following the blue sprints of its 1930s predecessor Johnson’s Great Society, it heavily stressed social reform and used media coverage for reform movement which was to make its plan seem more desirable. Fostering mistrust in American people, presidents misdoing were caught on tape and were broadcasted for all the people to see, but Nixon’s Watergate ended this era of complacency with ideals.

7 0

3 years ago

I believe that government regulations hinder free market capitalism and job

Lelechka [254]

Answer:

conservative b is the answer

8 0

3 years ago

Although the religion of Islam was founded over 1000 years ago, over one billion people still follow its teachings today. This i

Tresset [83]

Answer:

The preaching of Islam started over some 1400 years ago in the region of Saudi Arabia, as at first there were very less number of believers but it then drastically decreased due to the reason that people were convinced that its a more complete religion as compared the other two Ibrahimic religions(i.e Christianity and Judaism).As the preaching of Islam had most of its clauses related to that of the other two and that is the reason more and more people were convinced to follow up on the idea.

Along, with that there were exploration done by the Muslims across the regions, and they were able to assemble even an army for fighting battles with any oppressor inside these lands.So, along with this there were many influential people who accepted the religion and made it more easy to spread across the region.

As, the teaching of Islam influenced the art, culture and languages across the globe. So, generations after generation studied the Holy Book Quran, translations were made and the message was spread across billions of people across the generations.
And such an idea is termed to be as the historical continuity.

6 0

3 years ago