1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
6

When Washington said that the United States would be "friendly and impartial" in regard to foreign conflicts he was, in essence,

saying that the United States would remain neutral.
a. True
b. False
History
1 answer:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
6 0
True.

This was evidenced by the Neutrality Acts of 1930s.

The 1st Neutrality Act was the prohibition of export of "arms, ammunition, and implements of war" from the U.S. to foreign nations at war. The act requires arms manufacturer in the United States to apply for export license before they can exports arms to foreign nations.

The Neutrality Act of 1937 forbids U.S. Citizens from boarding belligerent ships. American ships were also prevented by this Act to transport arms to belligerents even if the arms were made outside the U.S. The Act also gave the President the right to bar belligerent ships from all U.S. waters.

However, there was an exception to this Act. Belligerent nations were allowed, at the discretion of the president, to acquire any items except arms from the United States, as long as they immediately pay for these items and carry them on non-American ships. This provision is called the "cash-and-carry".

The final Neutrality Act was passed on November 1939. This act lifted the arms embargo and put all trade with belligerent nations under the terms of "cash-and-carry". The ban on loans and barring of American ships transporting goods to belligerent nations still remain in effect.

You might be interested in
What is a constitution
ahrayia [7]

es el conjunto de normas fundamentales de un Estado soberano, las cuales suelen estar expresadas de forma escrita y fijan los límites y las relaciones entre los poderes del Estado

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would it be like to live in a society where such laws were enforced?
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

Specifically for law enforcement, social contract theory is important to justify the power that law enforcement can exert over the population as a whole . The power imbalance, held by law enforcement, is part of the contract that society has agreed upon in exchange for security.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which economic theory motivated the English to colonize the Americas
N76 [4]

Answer: Mercantilism

Explanation:

It was an economic doctrine that emerged during the sixteenth century. Mercantilism was the dominant economic doctrine during the colonization of North America by England. Mercantilism maximizes the export of raw materials, and it implies the strengthening of national policy. Mercantilism was present even after the colonization of the New World. The English tried in various ways to place products on the soil of North America and enforce certain laws on the soil of the American colonies, all for economic gain. There have been many such examples throughout colonial history, and one of those laws is the Stamps Act. Mercantilism can be presented as the embryo of capitalist doctrine.

6 0
3 years ago
Why is the French Revolution important?
Naily [24]
The French Revolution is important because it was a major change in government; it brought an end to absolute monarchy and a start to a representative government.
8 0
3 years ago
The term "Pax Romana" refers to the period of __________.
gregori [183]
The term "Pax Romana" refers to the period of a. peace and prosperity during the first two centuries of Roman Empire.

"Pax Romana" is a Latin term which means "Roman Peace". This long period of peace and prosperity spanned for an approximated 206 years, after the end of the Final War of the Roman Republic and before the start of the Crisis of the Third Century.

"Pax Romana" was also called "Pax Augusta" since it was established by Augustus when he defeated Marc Antony in the Battle of Actium in 2nd September 21 BC. Augustus then created a junta of the greatest military magnates and stood as their leader. This move eliminated the possibility of having a civil war among great military leaders.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Lady or The Tiger
    5·1 answer
  • why you think one cause had a bigger impact than the other causes. In a paragraph someone please help me?
    9·1 answer
  • Electric appliances first began to change American homes in the 1920s. true false
    10·2 answers
  • Which prediction can mostly likely be made based on this scenario?
    14·2 answers
  • It is considered as the golden age of a Capella music?
    14·1 answer
  • Is there any other court higher than the supreme court?
    5·1 answer
  • What effect did United States entry into the war have
    9·2 answers
  • The practice of the Supreme Court in which they determine the constitutionality of a law passed by Congress or one of the states
    9·1 answer
  • How did President Bill Clinton envision the U.S. role in world politics?
    6·1 answer
  • I’m really bad at history :|
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!