Answer:
is supposed to keep the government small and keep the government from violating our god-given rights keep us free from invasions and allow the citizens of each state to participate in government. what it is supposed to do for the state is coordinate them facilitate inteaction among them make sure each date is treated fairly and give each state a voice in the federal government unfortunately since the Constitution is not following very well these days to a great degree those in government are allowing it to do its job that's why we are in such a mess in Washington
I believe it is the first one.
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
Answer:
Fought for the political and social rights of African Americans.
Explanation: hope this helps!
Explanation: Congress establishes special courts for particular reasons. These reasons often reflect what's happening in the country.
