According to social judgment theory, <u>the judgmental anchor</u> is the person's actual or preferred position.
A framework for studying human judgement is called social judgement theory. It is a meta-theory that guides study on cognitive perspective, or how one interprets the world. A contrast effect is likely to occur when a stimulus is further from one's judging anchor, while an assimilation effect may occur when the stimulus is close to the anchor, according to the underlying psychophysical principle.
The social judgement theory represents an effort to apply the findings and psychophysical principles of judgement to social judgement. SJT is a theory that primarily concentrates on a person's internal processes of their own judgement in relation to the relation inside a communicated message, using the person's chosen viewpoint as the judgmental anchor. The idea was to describe the conditions under which persuasive communications had the best chance of working.
To learn more about social judgment theory here,
brainly.com/question/15118669
#SPJ4
The nurse sets the infusion rate to 125 ml/hr. 125000mg of thiamine will the patient receive per hour.
(1 ml = 1000mg
125 ml = 125000mg)
<h3>
What is thiamine?</h3>
Vitamin B1 (thiamine), often known as thiamine, is a water-soluble vitamin that can be obtained as a dietary supplement or naturally in some foods. The growth and operation of different cells depend heavily on thiamin. There is a daily requirement for thiamin because only trace amounts are kept in the liver.
<h3>
Why would a person need infusions?</h3>
When a patient is unable to take medication orally or when intravenous therapy is more beneficial, it is frequently utilized in hospitals. Treatments for cancer, dehydration, gastrointestinal disorders, and autoimmune diseases are a few examples. Other uses include treating serious infections.
Learn more about thiamine: brainly.com/question/15292743
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
In modern times me may see color film or modernized clothing.
It is to inform on how life was like back then.
Answer:
No, it definitely was not pure racism.
Explanation:
While individuals who have pure hatred and racist views against other groups of people have always existed, during the centuries that slavery existed, not everyone who owned slaves or supported slavery justified their position on the basis of racist arguments.
Very often, these arguments in favor of racism were made from an economic point of view. They justified slavery because slavery was fundamental for their economic well-being. Some people even justified slavery under supposedly moral, ethical, or religious reasons, arguing that slaves were better off under the control of their owners, or that some religious scripture justified slavery.
