1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
brilliants [131]
3 years ago
11

Suppose that in a country people gain more confidence in the banking system and so hold relatively less currency and more deposi

ts. As a result, bank reserves will a. increase and the money supply will eventually decrease. b. increase and the money supply will eventually increase. c. decrease and the money supply will eventually increase. d. decrease and the money supply will eventually decrease
Social Studies
1 answer:
VikaD [51]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a. increase and the money supply will eventually decrease.

Explanation:

This is most likely what would happen in this situation. In a country where people have a lot of confidence in the banking system, people would be more likely to deposit their money in the bank. Therefore, this will increase bank reserves. However, if this happened, then people would hold relatively less currency, which means that the money supply would eventually decrease.

You might be interested in
in 1995 citizens of one canadian province voted to whether or not seceed from canada what province was this
Radda [10]
The answer is Quebec
Hope this helps :)
7 0
3 years ago
What is the major difference between the strategies of caulobacter and proteus in nutrient acquisition?
Pepsi [2]

The major difference between the strategies of caulobacter and proteus in the nutrient acquisition is Caulobacter increases its own cell surface area while Proteus covers the more nutrient-containing surface area to improve nutrient absorption.

<h3>What is nutrient acquisition?</h3>

A process in which a substance that nourishes development or digestion is referred to as acquiring nutrients. Most nutrients are obtained through food for both humans and animals. Mostly in the form of minerals, plants take up nutrients from the soil.

Proteus covers the surface area that contains more nutrients to enhance nutrient absorption, Caulobacter provides a large surface area of its own cells.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the nutrient acquisition, here:

brainly.com/question/18687690

#SPJ4

The incomplete question is

What is the major difference between the strategies of Caulobacter and Proteus in nutrient acquisition?

A. Caulobacter increases its own cell surface area while Proteus covers more nutrient-containing surface area to improve nutrient absorption

B. Proteus increases its own cell surface area while Caulobacter covers more nutrient-containing surface area to improve nutrient absorption

C. Caulobacter uses pili to attach to new surface areas while Proteus uses axial filaments for enhanced motility

D. Proteus uses pili to attach to new surface areas while Caulobacter uses axial filaments for enhanced motility

E. None is a correct statement

4 0
2 years ago
Do political parties today argue about the same issues that followers of Hamilton and Jefferson argued about?
tia_tia [17]
It really depends on the issues you are talking about. When it comes to basic human rights like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness I would say yes. However, I don’t hunk they were talking about equality in the lgbt+ community, aborti*n, or gun control. Hope this helped
4 0
3 years ago
Rachel has a pessimistic attitude. she worries incessantly about things and can never seem to see the positive side of life. acc
motikmotik

<span>Having a pessimistic attitude shows having low levels of SEROTONIN. Being pessimistic shows that a person always thinks of the worst or always thinking negative. Some study states that low levels of serotonin will give a person a tendency to be depressed and to feel down.</span>

5 0
4 years ago
Which of these is one of the results of the Schenck decision?
andrew11 [14]
One of the results of the Schenck decision is: <span>A.The decision removed protections for dangerous speech.

Dangerous speech is not considered a heavy violation of the law due to the nature of the first amendment.  For  example, no matter whether a doctors is right or wrong, police could no arrest him simply just by saying "this patient couldn't be saved"</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help please!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Decreased amounts of __________ and __________ are thought to be contributing factors in the development of the cognitive impair
    11·1 answer
  • DEBATE: Should cellphones be allowed in class why or why not -Explain please-
    7·2 answers
  • What are the 3 stages of the water cycle?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the name of one sports team that plays in seattle, wa?
    13·1 answer
  • What is implicit bias?
    14·1 answer
  • American Engineering, Inc., defends against a breach-of-contract suit by Beta Corporation by claiming that the consideration for
    6·1 answer
  • Why might citizens choose to join a political party?
    8·2 answers
  • How were the civilizations that existed in eastern central and southern Africa alike and different
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ASSAPPPPPPPPP :D
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!