Answer:
Ecological validity
Explanation:
Ecological validity is define as the way in which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real life settings.
Owens et al. (2011) manipulating texting while driving conditions (i.e., driving with no texting, driving while texting on a personal phone, driving while texting using an in-vehicle texting system) to see if this influenced visual and steering behaviors of drivers. Participants completed the task by texting the researcher on a closed course. The testing conditions serves as the ecological validity in which the researchers use his finding to generalize it to a real life setting thereby using it to predict the behaviour of the participants in real world settings.
Answer:
c.) discrimination
Explanation:
The practice of treating equal people unequally and not letting them have the same opportunities to compete for social and economic rewards is called <u>discrimination</u>. Discrimination is the practice of treating someone differently because of that person's perceived status or characteristics. Discrimination can be positive (in favor of a person), as when someone is offered a job because of that person's sex. However, discrimination is often discussed as negative – for example, when someone is barred from voting because of that person's race.
That person is experiencing
"Stagnation".
Stagnation is the condition of being still, or not moving,
similar to a sitting puddle of water where stagnation draws insects etc. In psychological
terms Stagnation alludes to the inability to figure out how to contribute.
Generativity versus stagnation is the seventh of eight phases of Erik Erikson's
hypothesis of psychosocial improvement.
Answer:C) noncompensatory decision
Explanation:
Peter's decisions is fixed and made up no matter what comparisons are made of other universities but he has made up a firm decision that he can not compromise no matter how tempting the fact still remains that his girlfriend will not be close to those universities which are further away from his home town.
He had already calculated the cost of his decision and made conclusion that this is the best decision for him .
I disagree because we all know that the earth isn't flat and way back when when this happend they didn't had all of the tecnolgy that we have today so then how did he think that the earth was flat even though after the one persons presentation of the earth that he was still questioning the person that was giving the presentation.
