The Milgram experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, and it measured the obedience that people display towards authority figures. In these experiments, participants were asked to obey an authority figure who asked them to administer shocks to a patient. The shocks were not real, but the participants were not aware of this.
There are several ethical dilemmas here, with the most important one being the trauma that the experiment might have caused on participants. The experiment showed many people that they were actually capable of committing terrible atrocities just to follow orders. This was a realization that had a significant impact on people.
Although no one was physically shocked, many people believed that the subjects were, and this was a source of stress and worry for participants. Moreover, this also means that the participants were not told all the details of the experiment, which some critics find unethical. I do not think that the ends always justify the means, and I think this situation presented some serious ethical problems. If a replication of the experiment actually shocked people, the ethical problems would increase.
The experiment found that a very high percentage of people were willing to compromise their ethical values in order to fulfill the orders of others, even when this caused pain to the subjects.
The colonists were not at all happy at the way Stamp Act was forced on them without taking their consent. The tax was being taken by the Britishers to support their wars in North America. The colonists not only debated about this tax in colonial legislature, but also distributed written documents against the act. Mob or crowd action against the tax collectors was another way of protesting against the tax. Colonists were so angry that they even tar and feather the tax collectors. This ways were all to indicate their anger towards implementation of the Stamp Act.
Cliff dwellers who disappeared mysteriously were anasazi indians I hope this helped!
A. Parizade, who put cotton in her ears to shut out loud jeers and proceeded toward the three treasures.
Answer: (D) Informal sanction
Explanation:
The informal sanction is basically refers to the norms or the rules which is not authorized as it is written in an informal way. It is also known as the informal social sanction as it occur due to the interaction between people.
The informal sanction is not the legal norm and it can be easily apply to the member of any team or group.
According to the question, Jennifer is attend the business luncheon with the various executives in an organization and in this context the glare is best illustrate the informal sanction example.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.