1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tasya [4]
3 years ago
12

The world population during the Paleolithic Era numbered around _____. 10 million 350,000 1 billion 6 billion

History
1 answer:
elena-s [515]3 years ago
8 0
The world population during the Paleolithic Era was under 10 Million ( so the first answer is the best), It achieved the next option ( I assume that the option 2 is actually 350 000 000, so that it´s in an increasig order) only in our time (common era, when the time was no longer BCE).
You might be interested in
How did industrialization affect children, women,<br> and families in the Gilded Age?
Alekssandra [29.7K]
The Gilded Age was an era of rapid economic growth, especially in the North and West. As American wages were much higher than those in Europe, especially for skilled workers, the period saw an influx of millions of European immigrants. The rapid expansion of industrialization led to real wage growth of 60% between 1860 and 1890, spread across the ever-increasing labour force. The average annual wage per industrial worker (including men, women and children) rose from $380 in 1880 to $564 in 1890, a gain of 48%. However, the Gilded Age was also an era of abject poverty and inequality as millions of immigrants—many from impoverished European nations—poured into the United States, and the high concentration of wealth became more visible and contentious
4 0
3 years ago
Florida’s habitats are threatened by pollution and development, so
Digiron [165]
Florida’s habitats are threatened by pollution and development, so <span>more than one hundred species of animals are endangered.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Do you think the United States should have retained an isolationist stance
saveliy_v [14]

I think to a degree we should have. In WWII I think entering the war was necessary after Pearl Harbor, but nowadays I think we need to focus on America first, and stop worrying about every little thing in other countries. America has a lot of problems it needs to fix, and pulling out of other countries affairs would be a good way to do so.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“Candidate Smith is obviously the better woman for the job. No one can match her education and experience.”— Al Anchor, reporter
Ksju [112]

Answer: B. Has a bias in favor of Smith

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Was emperor meiji right or wrong to force the modernization of japan?
xeze [42]

Answer:

right

Explanation:

he enriched economy

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was ironic about andrew jackson's great victory at the battle of new orleans?
    10·1 answer
  • What aspects of civil rights protests helped the protesters gain public support for their cause
    8·1 answer
  • Describe a situation where a minority group resists repression by the dominant group. Where did you see or hear about this situa
    10·2 answers
  • Why was the D-Day plan so risky?
    11·1 answer
  • Based on this cartoon, what problem did the United States face in Asia by 1953?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which agency was not one in which Reagan appointees pushed for government deregulation?
    14·1 answer
  • How many presidents are there in the world?
    11·2 answers
  • What were the types of nuclear bombs created in the 1940s and 1950s?
    12·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP!! I will mark brainliest!
    8·1 answer
  • In what building was the declaration of independence signed
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!