1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nekit [7.7K]
4 years ago
10

I need an answer asap!!

History
2 answers:
astra-53 [7]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:B. States began enacting harsher punishments for young offenders

Explanation:I took a test with the same question and got it correct :3

GaryK [48]4 years ago
5 0

Answer: a

courts began to focus on rehabilitation for the first time.

<u>Explanation:</u>

In 1990, the founders of the Juvenile court made reforms for the rehabilitation of young criminals as they saw the young criminals activities a result of negative social interactions.

The founders of the court realized that the young people were being harmed by social factors leading them to crimes. The purpose of this rehabilitation mission was to treat the criminals right so that they avoid a life of crimes in the future.

You might be interested in
Who holds the right to public trial?​
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be ...

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why do you say some of the outcome of the War of 1812 was peace without victory?
Lyrx [107]

B, the war was effectively a stalemate and didn't result in much change except for the rise of Andrew Jackson due to his famous victory

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were conditions best described for workers in mines, mills and factories prior to
GrogVix [38]
Dangerous. Poor ventilation, little to no health and safety measures, dusty, hot.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Three arguments against agricultural subsidies
Mademuasel [1]
<span>Agricultural subsidies are supposed to lower food prices and help farmers. However, they don't always do either. Moreover, lower food prices and more farmers have their own social costs.

The truth is that all across the world farmers are getting more efficient and can grow and harvest more crops with fewer people. That isn't about to change any time soon, and there's very little government can do about it.

There are several ways you can go about subsidizing agriculture, for example:
<span>Direct cash payments to farmersQuotas and production controlsLabor lawsTax creditsProviding water and electricity at reduced prices</span>And so forth.

The problem is that, as time goes on, everyone gets used to the system and it gets out of whack with actual demand. For example, tobacco use has been steadily dropping, but tobacco farmers still get subsidies (either to grow or not to grow) and the Western nations grow tobacco to export (along with the health detriment, which is now hitting Africa and China). 

As another example, corn is cheap, but the U.S. produces about five times as much now as it did in 1940, although the population has only doubled. As such, a lot of it is just fed to livestock. More problematically, a lot of it is exported to Mexico, where corn can be grown more cheaply, but can't be sold against subsidized American corn, which costs less. 

Here in Canada, there is a quota system for dairy which means we don't produce much surplus. However, at retail, milk cost about twice here what it does in the U.S.  We can't figure out how to dismantle the system so at least milk will cost about the same as it does in other countries. Trying to dismantle the system might be more expensive than leaving it in place. It might also mean more milk is produced than is consumed, which would again push the market out of whack.</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under the Articles of Confederation, states were allowed to print their own currencies.
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Although the Articles of Confederation authorized Congress to mint and issue currency, it did not prevent or discourage the individual states from issuing their own currencies. ... Because of this, some states charged duties on imports from other states.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Before the Japanese learned the slaking process the clay was in what condition?
    12·1 answer
  • Mahatma Gandhi inspired Martin Luther King, Jr. through his use of
    12·1 answer
  • Which three major rivers flow through the land claimed by France?
    15·1 answer
  • Third parties have influenced some elections in U.S. history by doing which of the following?
    14·2 answers
  • What effect did the slave trade have on Africa? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • The bottom of a ladder is placed 4 feet away from a house and it reaches a height of 16 feet on the side of the house. What is t
    8·1 answer
  • (WILL GIVE BRAINLYEST) BEING CORRECT IS BETTER THAN BEING FASTER
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think the courts has an odd number of judges?
    9·1 answer
  • The chairperson of a committee decides who else will serve on that committee.
    14·1 answer
  • Three argument points for Whitney versus California
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!