Rainsford’s response to Zaroff indicates that: <span>A.he is opposed to the idea of hunting humans
From the conversation between Rainsford and Zaroff, we can conclude that even though Rainsford loves hunting, he considered hunting humans being is considered a murder and he thought that Zaroff is losing his mind for even mentioning it.</span>
Picture ??? nobody knows what ur talking about
The answer is the first one.
In "Writers often disavow the notion of a 'literary duty'" the author conveys a somewhat condescending attitude, as if they would always follow this and set aside anyone who said otherwise. This attitude says the author is looking down on them, and that the author believes that many authors do not meet their standards.
Another answer I would consider is "...writers ruined by their shrill commitments." However, there is no context or clear tone. The author could be mournful of the lost potential for all we know.
Answer:
B: Experts today estimate that 20,000- 30,000 laborers worked on the pyramid at any one time.
Explanation:
The main idea about the task of builting the pyramid, which required a huge workforce, is supported by the detail described in option B that says that the experts estimate the number of workers involved in this colossal project: <em>between 20,000 and 30,000 laborers is to be considered a huge workforce.</em>
Wrokforce: all the people who work for a company or organization.
The Moscow art theater is more like an art institution, or a craftsman's cooperative society
