1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
2 years ago
9

What might have happened if MacArthur had convinced Truman to expand the fighting into China? How might today’s world be differe

nt?
History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I'll try my best

Explanation:

MacArthur was a one trick pony: Amphibious assaults. He would overwhelm coastal / island garrisons with Battle Ship delivered fire power, and inundate the island with American Soldiers and naval airpower into submission. He played his one trick in Korean War at Incheon. However, he has never conducted a successful high intensity land campaign. He did not partake in Okinawa, and failed to stop a combined arms assault on Luzon, as well as in Korea. In fact, his recommendation in the winter of 1950 was to evacuate Korea and reattempt an amphibious landing. US and Korea were lucky that he was fired at that point, and Ridgeway who cut his teeth in Europe brought the Chinese offensive to a halt in early 1951 at Chipyong Ni.

So, any counterfactual involving MacArthur staying onboard, would involve him expanding the war into China by assault landing Taiwanese (ROC) troops into Fujian, and perhaps into Yungui region, to try to link back up with RoC remnants on the Yunnan-Burma border. US Troops would have been landed alongside RoC forces into Shanghai - Nanjing region, replicating the successful Japanese amphibious landings there a decade earlier.

RoK forces and USMC would have reeneacted Incheon landing, perhaps coupled with a simultaneous landing at Wonsan, effectively double enveloping the PVA in southern Korea.

Will it have succeeded? PRC and NorKo had no real Navy at the time, and US enjoyed uncontested Air Supremacy. Only impediments to sea lane logistics would have been the Typhoons, and other natural disasaters.

MacArthur also wanted to remilitarize Japan and to use its veterans in this expended war effort. Most likely, his splintered efforts on multiple fronts would have been contained and eliminated in detail by the sheer mass of trained reserves that PLA had in early 1950s. However, if he did somehow succeed in expanding the beachheads and eventually connecting them, the area contorlled by US and proxy forces would have closely resembled the final disposition of troops by IJA in the summer of 1945, minus Manchuria. China will have been forced to recall the PVA to bolster the defense of Manchurian and Hebei. Korea would have been united, possibly, but at this point, there would have been a strong likelihood of Russia entering the war to defend Manchuria, and retake Korea… and perhaps a European Front opening, beginning with an overrunning of Berlin.

All in all, Truman made the right decision to remove this overrated one trick pony whose time had come.

You might be interested in
Consider the writing prompt.
Archy [21]

Answer:

D - How did economic differences between the Northern and Southern states lead to the North’s victory in the Civil War?

Explanation:

right on edge 2021

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which answer would be the BEST prediction as to what might happen as a result of the events in the passage?
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

What are the options?  we don't even know the passage.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the gilded age
Troyanec [42]
Gilded age is defined as the time between the Civil war captain America and world war z :\


Just kidding is the the time between the Civil War and World war 1 during which the US population and economy grew quickly.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The government can sell treasury bonds when it needs money to fund certain projects
Evgesh-ka [11]
Yes the government can sell treasury bonds which is why we’re so in debt.
6 0
2 years ago
What does the President do as the Party Chief
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

He does a few things

Explanation:

In a governmental system, a party leader acts as the official representative of their political party. The party leader is typically responsible for managing the party's relationship with the general public.

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What kind of unions were formed in the late 19th century
    6·1 answer
  • Which was not a member of early Chinese social classes? A. peasants and slaves B. people of nobility C. craft workers D. scribes
    14·2 answers
  • 6.How did the Mayans use Astronomy?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these was NOT a cause of the Great Depression
    13·1 answer
  • Constitutional powers of the president
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the American revolution start in great Britain?​
    11·1 answer
  • What is the main reason for the rise of "Hoovervilles"
    5·1 answer
  • What are opposites of federalists? i need 3
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Hernando de Soto explore Florida?
    10·2 answers
  • What is a political party, and why was this seen as something new that the writers of the Constitution didn't plan for?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!