1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
2 years ago
9

What might have happened if MacArthur had convinced Truman to expand the fighting into China? How might today’s world be differe

nt?
History
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I'll try my best

Explanation:

MacArthur was a one trick pony: Amphibious assaults. He would overwhelm coastal / island garrisons with Battle Ship delivered fire power, and inundate the island with American Soldiers and naval airpower into submission. He played his one trick in Korean War at Incheon. However, he has never conducted a successful high intensity land campaign. He did not partake in Okinawa, and failed to stop a combined arms assault on Luzon, as well as in Korea. In fact, his recommendation in the winter of 1950 was to evacuate Korea and reattempt an amphibious landing. US and Korea were lucky that he was fired at that point, and Ridgeway who cut his teeth in Europe brought the Chinese offensive to a halt in early 1951 at Chipyong Ni.

So, any counterfactual involving MacArthur staying onboard, would involve him expanding the war into China by assault landing Taiwanese (ROC) troops into Fujian, and perhaps into Yungui region, to try to link back up with RoC remnants on the Yunnan-Burma border. US Troops would have been landed alongside RoC forces into Shanghai - Nanjing region, replicating the successful Japanese amphibious landings there a decade earlier.

RoK forces and USMC would have reeneacted Incheon landing, perhaps coupled with a simultaneous landing at Wonsan, effectively double enveloping the PVA in southern Korea.

Will it have succeeded? PRC and NorKo had no real Navy at the time, and US enjoyed uncontested Air Supremacy. Only impediments to sea lane logistics would have been the Typhoons, and other natural disasaters.

MacArthur also wanted to remilitarize Japan and to use its veterans in this expended war effort. Most likely, his splintered efforts on multiple fronts would have been contained and eliminated in detail by the sheer mass of trained reserves that PLA had in early 1950s. However, if he did somehow succeed in expanding the beachheads and eventually connecting them, the area contorlled by US and proxy forces would have closely resembled the final disposition of troops by IJA in the summer of 1945, minus Manchuria. China will have been forced to recall the PVA to bolster the defense of Manchurian and Hebei. Korea would have been united, possibly, but at this point, there would have been a strong likelihood of Russia entering the war to defend Manchuria, and retake Korea… and perhaps a European Front opening, beginning with an overrunning of Berlin.

All in all, Truman made the right decision to remove this overrated one trick pony whose time had come.

You might be interested in
What was one of the first things that the New Englanders built in their communities?
d1i1m1o1n [39]

New Englanders built schools. New Englanders were the group of settlers who came and settled first in Jamestown.

Explanation:

New Englanders were the colonists who settled in Jamestown. Native Americans posed to be  a threat to the colonists. As time passed by, the settlers started to learn how to live in wilderness. The colonists who came from Britain were a group pf Puritans who believed that the churches in America needed Purification. Puritan community activities revolved around the church. Church services and offering mass prayer was considered important on Sundays.

Holy Gospel occupied a very important place in the life of Puritans. They felt education is necessary for them because it would give knowledge to the people to read Bible. Hence Puritans started to open schools and ensured that all were imparted with education so that they read the holy Bible.

4 0
2 years ago
Which was not a major accomplishment of byzantine culture?​
zvonat [6]

Answer:

are their any awnser choices

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following most directly influenced Serbian culture? Select all that apply.
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

orthodox christanity

roman catholicism

Explanation:

greek is founed on religion

6 0
2 years ago
What did european countries do starting in the mid 1800s to accuire more natural resources
laila [671]

They colonized in the new world and Africa  

4 0
3 years ago
Según David Ricardo, el proceso productivo no es un proceso natural ya que la naturaleza no es generosa con el hombre, a no ser
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Según David Ricardo, el proceso productivo no es un proceso natural ya que la naturaleza no es generosa con el hombre, a no ser que este la convierta en productiva y la adecue a sus intereses. En otras palabras, la renta surgía en un país no a causa de la liberalidad de la naturaleza sino de la avaricia, por lo tanto, la riqueza implicaba la pobreza de unos y el enriquecimiento de otros. Lo anterior significa que la acumulación de capital no es el nacimiento de una nueva riqueza sino el empobrecimiento de otros, porque  LO QUE GANABAN LOS TERRATENIENTES EN LA TIERRA LO PERDÍAN QUIENES TRABAJABAN EN ELLA.

Explanation:

David Ricardo fue un economista británico. Quizás su contribución más importante a la ciencia económica fue la ley de la ventaja comparativa, un argumento fundamental a favor del libre comercio entre países. Ricardo argumentó que el comercio (o intercambio) era beneficioso para ambas partes involucradas, incluso si una de las partes (por ejemplo, un país rico en recursos) era más productivo en cada área que su socio comercial (por ejemplo, un país pobre en recursos), siempre que ambas partes se concentraran en eso actividades donde tenían una ventaja relativa de productividad.

Ahora bien, estas ventajas no eran equitativamente distribuidas entre sus productores a distintos niveles: según su teoría de la renta diferencial, la renta de la producción económica se distribuía de forma desigual, siendo mayor para quien menos producía (el terrateniente), mientras el trabajador, que era el principal productor de riqueza, recibía una pequeña porción de esta. De esta forma, Ricardo interpretaba la renta de la tierra como el principal factor de riqueza de su época.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Western New York called the “Burned-over District” during the “Second Great Awakening”?
    11·1 answer
  • What does it mean to invest?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the populist movement energize thousands of american women?
    12·1 answer
  • How did political machines hurt cities
    6·1 answer
  • In order to have their beliefs considered as public opinion, people must _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Which best describes European attitudes about influencing American Indians? (A) forceful (B) hesitant (C) interested (D) relaxed
    6·1 answer
  • How did the polytheistic religion of the olmec affect their culture?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which region was ruled by the Safavid emperor?
    5·2 answers
  • What were the goals of Chinese reformers
    8·1 answer
  • The Byzantine Empire came to power after:
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!