The answer would be a it should be right if I’m wrong I’ll fix it for you
Answer:
When someone shares their pronouns, it is an indication of how they would like to be referred to in the third person. Pronouns in the first person (referring to yourself– e.g., “I”) or second person (referring to the person you're speaking to– e.g., “you”) do not change.
Explanation:
basically just call them by, (she,her,hers) (he,him,his) (they,there,there's) and so on
Answer:
There are hints in the story that suggests that Mon-t-re-sor considered Fortun-ato to be naive.
And, Mon-t-re-sor did not regret Fortun-ato's ignorance.
Explanation:
'The Cask of Amon-tillado' is a short story written by Edgar Allan Poe. The story is a revenge narration of Mont-resor, who is confessing his crime to someone fifty years later after he committed the crime.
From the stories, one can find clues that Mont-resor considered Fortun-ato to be a fool. When he states <em>'I was so pleased to see him, that I thought I should never have done wrin-gi-ng his hand.' </em>
Mont-resor also never regretted Fortun-ato's ignorance rather he was pleased that he did not have to wr-ing his hand to exert his plan.
Answer:
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
Explanation:
They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.
They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.
<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.
They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.
