Answer:
( 4, 0 ) and ( 0,-8 )
Step-by-step explanation:
→ Rearrange into y = mx + c format
4x - 2y = 16
→ Minus 4x from both sides
-2y = -4x + 16
→ Divide everything by 2
-y = -2x + 8
→ Multiply everything by -1
y = 2x - 8
→ Substitute x = 0 to find the y-intercept and y = 0 to find the x intercept
x = 0 then y = -8 so ( 0,-8 )
y = 0 then x = 4 so ( 4, 0 )

We know that the Angle subtended by an arc on centre of the circle is double as that of Angle subtended by the same arc on the circumference (boundary) of the circle
So,
Answer:
m=#miles
so 130= .5m+30
subtract 30 from each side
100$= .5m than divide .5 to isolate m
m= 200
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
5.5
Step-by-step explanation:
The y-intercept of the line graph shown above is the value of the point where the line cuts the y-axis. The y-intercept of this graph is between 5 and 6. However, we can get an accurate value by calculation. This can be done by generating an equation of the line.
Recall the slope-intercept equation,
, where m = slope of the line, b = y-intercept.
To generate the equation of the line, first find slope using the points (-2, 7) and (6, 1):
.
Substitute m = ¾ and the coordinates (6, 1) into the slope-intercept equation to find the y-intercept (b):






Therefore, b = y-intercept = 5.5.
To generate the equation of the line, plug in the values of m and b, we would have:
y = ¾x + 5.5
The y-intercept of the line of the graph is 5.5.
The converse of t > r is r > t
<h3>What is a converse statement?</h3>
A converse statement is determined when both the hypothesis and conclusion are reversed or interchanged.
In this condition, the hypothesis is written as the conclusion and the conclusion is changed to be the hypothesis.
If a conditional statement is written as: x → y
The converse is then written as y → x
Where;
- x is the hypothesis
- y is the conclusion
Given the expression as;
t > r
We can see that;
- The variable 't' is the hypothesis
- The variable 'r' is the conclusion
The converse will be;
r > t
Hence, the converse is r > t
Learn more about converse statement here:
brainly.com/question/3965750
#SPJ1