I think that the scientists should make decisions about how land is used, particularly those who study demography. They devote their live to finding a way to provide resources to everyone on the planet. If there was a particular group of these people who oversee the growth and distribution of resources, then humans might have a better chance of avoiding these "end of the world" scenarios.But also governments,because they have control over almost everything.
Hope this helps :)
C. People Sold More Stock, Which Caused Stock Prices To Continue To Fall.
Answer:
Since before recorded history, environmental changes have affected things people value. In consequence, people have migrated or changed their ways of living as polar ice advanced and retreated, endured crop failures or altered their crops when temperature and rainfall patterns changed, and made numerous other adjustments in individual and collective behavior. Until very recently, people have responded to global phenomena as if they were local, have not organized their responses as government policies, and have not been able to respond by deliberately altering the course of the global changes themselves. Things are different now from what they have been for millennia.
This chapter examines the range of human consequences of, and responses to, global environmental change. We begin by developing the concept of human consequences and showing why, to understand them, it is critical to understand the variety of human responses to global change. We then offer a framework for thinking about human responses and discuss the pivotal role of conflict. The next section examines three cases that illustrate many of the major factors influencing the human consequences of global change. The following sections describe the human systems that are affected by or respond to global change, and how they interrelate. We conclude by offering some general principles for research and some research implications.
Explanation:
Because the government doesn't have that much money.
