Answer:
In the Roman Republic, a very complex civilization developed. Rome’s social structure was strict. Patricians were perched at the top of the social structure and slaves were at the bottom. In the middle, plebeians and freedmen were found. A person’s status in life was determined not only by his or her social class but also by gender and children. Women and children often had different rights and responsibilities than did men of any class in Rome.
Imagine that today’s texting technology was invented during the time in which the Roman Republic existed. What might a text message conversation between two Roman children be like? In this assignment, you will create the script for a text message conversation between a Roman child from the upper class and a Roman child from the lower class. Your fictional conversation should have at least a total of 10 messages between the two participants. Before you begin your assignment take a few minutes to review Level 1 of the Integrating Knowledge and Ideas into the Study of History Activity.
The text messages conversation must:
have a total of 10 text messages, each at least two complete sentences
describe the differences in the daily lives of upper class and lower class citizens
describe the opportunities for children in general in Rome
compare how life differed for female and male children in Rome
explain the effect of social status on one’s future in the Roman Republic
Use the cell phone template to create your conversation between the two children. While you can be creative in your dialogue, be sure that you write in complete sentences and that your script includes enough information and details to clearly explain what each child’s life is like.
Explanation:
The slave culture made the slaves work together to survive. This promoted family, loyalty, and empathy/sympathy for each other. Due to this it caused them to not loose hope and always help each other.
The answer is C it is the one that makes the most same so wild guess that it is c
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
<span>Nixon's Southern Strategy won the support of "southern white" voters, since this allowed the Republican Party to take back these voters who had previously been democratic. </span>
