Answer:
1.28
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you need to do 82/64, which will give you just x. Then, you need to round to three places. Without rounding it would be 1.28125
So with rounding it would be 1.28. Hope this helps and Happy learning!
Answer:
width = 3.5 m
length = 18 m
Step-by-step explanation:
area = length x width
x is the width then length = 2x + 11
x(2x + 11) = 63
2x^2 + 11x - 63 = 0
The formula to solve a quadratic equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 is equal to x = [-b +/-√(b^2 - 4ac)]/2a
with a = 2
b = 11
c = -63
substitute in the formula
x = [-11 +/- √(11^2 - 4(2)(-63))]2(2)
x = [-11 +/- √(121 + 504)]/4
x = [-11 +/- √625]/4
x = (-11 +/- 25)/4
x1 = (-11 + 25)/4 = 14/4 = 3.5
x2 = (-11 - 25)/4 = -36/4 = -9
since width can't be a negative number, x is 3.5
length = 2x + 11 = 2(3.5) + 11 = 18
Answer:
probably 57 will be the answer
We must recall that a horizontal asymptote is the value/s of y that the given function approaches to but never reaches. To find this in a rational function, we compare the expressions with highest degree in the numerator and denominator. There are three possible outcome when this happens.
1. if the highest degree (highest exponent) in the numerator is bigger than that of the denominator, then there won't be any horizontal asymptote.
2. if the highest degree in the denominator is bigger, then the horizontal symptote would be y = 0.
3. if they have the same highest degree, then we just get the quotient of their coefficient.
Now, going back to our function, we have

From this we can see that the highest degree in the numerator is 1 (from 2x) and 2 (from x²) for the denominator. Clearly, it shows that its denominator has a higher degree. And from our discussion, we can conclude that the horizontal asymptote would be y = 0.
Answer: y = 0