Answer:
Slaves in the south and slaves in slave states that stayed with the union
Explanation:
Answer:
In the rural South, the main staple crop grown was cotton. Northern shippers depended on the profits from the cotton trade with Europe, and the cotton industry greatly expanded during the early 1800s. By 1840, cotton accounted for nearly half of all U.S. exports, and the South produced more than half of the world’s supply of cotton. As a result, the men who owned the land where cotton was grown held a powerful influence over the U.S. economy. The intensive work of growing cotton relied on the labor of enslaved African Americans. They cleared the land, planted the seeds, picked the cotton, and cleaned the cotton fibers by removing the seeds, all by hand. As landowners in the South gained more profits from the cotton industry, they bought more enslaved people to work the land. Because these men and women brought wealth to landowners, not only for the work they did, but also their value in the slave market, they were treated as investments in property. Enslaved people were bought and sold at auctions, and families were separated for economic reasons, such as when the landowner’s property was divided among his heirs or if he went bankrupt. Because the businesspeople involved in the cotton industry viewed enslaved people as assets, or valuable things that could be owned, they were not granted the democratic freedoms of citizens. Instead, the majority of enslaved people spent their lives on farms, performing manual labor that contributed to the economic success of the land owner and his family.
Ancient civilizations often credited the creation of the world to other worldly - or as we'd think of them today "supernatural" - beings who they personified as being decidedly human. The ancients did not tend to have the sort of scientific, logical, evidence-based understanding of the workings of the world that we have now. Instead, the credited the creation of the world to beings who they imagined as being human, in a sense, but also far more powerful and mystical.
Answer:
<h2>The power of judicial review</h2>
Explanation/context:
Judicial review refers to the Supreme Court's ability to review any law to see if it violates the US Constitution. Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
