1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mariarad [96]
3 years ago
9

PLZZ help!! god bless you!!!!

History
1 answer:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
3 0

1.  The key military concern referenced by the Court was that "properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast."  The military authorities feared that Japanese Americans would give information to the Japanese or might themselves engage in attacks against US military installations.  

2.  I do not agree with the majority opinion that racial prejudice did not play a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans.  There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance.  The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them.  It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans.  President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps.  By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps.  That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.

You might be interested in
Do you think the 1992 election of clinton made people nervous
laiz [17]

The Bush campaign patronized clinton's character and told Bush's foreign policy successes while Clinton focused on the economy.

6 0
3 years ago
What factor influenced African Americans to migrate from the South to Northern cities?
Afina-wow [57]

The main factor that influenced African Americans to migrate from the South to Northern cities was that they were looking for better economic opportunities.

The Great Migration, also known as the Great Northward Migration in the 20th century, happened because most black people were badly treated by many people that still expected African Americans to be slaves, and their economic conditions were quite poor.

As a result, African Americans decided to migrate to the Northern cities, where they would get many job opportunities as well as going to have a better lifestyle by not being discriminated.

4 0
3 years ago
How did empire-building benefit farm production?
Grace [21]

The correct answer is B) by providing more labor resources.

Empire-building benefited farm production by providing more labor resources.

Empire-building allowed the Emperors to expand their territories conquering new lands and having more servants to serve the king. This also meant having more labor resources, more hands ready to work in the farm fields to grow more crops, to produce more food for the empíre and trading purposes. Better crops and food production meant more trade, and more trade translated into more income and resources for the empire.

5 0
3 years ago
Name one reason that the native Americans agreed to treaties that were unfair to them
andrezito [222]
We have to remember that there was a big difference between the treaties themselves and the paper documents that European-Americans used to record those treaties. For many Native Americans, a treaty was an oral agreement between governments. It was methodically memorized and often sealed with an exchange of gifts. In the eastern part of North America, wampum belts (which were shells strung together to create images) served as official records of these treaties, and were draped over a speaker's body when the treaty was being recited later on, much as Europeans might read aloud the text of a written agreement between two European countries.

For Natives, the oral agreement, along with these wampum belts, WERE the treaty, and the paper document they signed was just some odd European habit that they often simply tolerated. Many of the Native leaders who signed these treaties could not read what they were signing, and even if they could they did not recognize the documents as being the official record of what was agreed on.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements can be inferred from the painting? (1 point)
True [87]

Answer:

B.Since there is a steamboat in the background, the Industrial Revolution must be at an end

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many free states existed in 1850 ?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the Holy book of Moses
    12·1 answer
  • The men's world record for swimming 1500.0 m in a long course pool (as of 2007) is 14 min 34.56 s. At this rate, how many second
    15·1 answer
  • Which choices are examples of self-governance during the period of salutary neglect?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about the right to vote?
    13·1 answer
  • What 2 things do Conservatives believe in?
    7·1 answer
  • 4. Which sentence is punctuated correctly?
    6·2 answers
  • 5. How does the conclusion in lines 63-69 contribute to the<br> development of ideas in the text?
    9·1 answer
  • List and arrange the development of letters in proper sequence. Kindly include the year, the first one is given to you. (20 poin
    12·1 answer
  • How was the American Southeast different from the North when it came to Native American populations?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!