Why is it good to have 2 major parties?

From how many miles could Ballistiv Missiles be fired, at the most?

Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

C. 3,500

Explanation:

Short-range ballistic missiles, traveling less than 1,000 kilometers (approximately 620 miles)

Medium-range ballistic missiles, traveling between 1,000–3,000 kilometers (approximately 620-1,860 miles)

Intermediate-range ballistic missiles, traveling between 3,000–5,500 kilometers (approximately 1,860-3,410 miles)

Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), traveling more than 5,500 kilometers.

8 0

2 years ago

What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Tatiana [17]

"A separate bill of rights was unnecessary because the new government would have limited power" is the best option, since they thought that this would be redundant in a Constitution already given to these ideals.

8 0

3 years ago

Do you think the "Founding Fathers" put more emphasis on the U.S. Congress and

Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

They created checks and balances to make sure one branch didn't get more powerful than the other. This makes it very unlikely that congress would get more emphasis on power than the other branches.

5 0

3 years ago

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.

8 0

3 years ago

What would be some advantages that unitary and confederate governments have over a federalist governments

mariarad [96]

Unitary government controls weaker states in which the power is not shared between states or province, the advantage is that they have uniform laws throughout the country and having orderliness and stability. While the Confederate government is a federation of independent states where the advantage is that it prevents the growth of a large central government by keeping the power at local levels making the several states cooperate regarding common concern. The federal government’s power, unlike the unitary and confederate government, was divided between central and local government where they have their own set of rules, and officials.

6 0

3 years ago