Answer:
Religious athletes have higher moral development than nonreligious athletes.
Explanation:
Athletes such as skier, Rebecca Dussault and weightlifter, Kulsoom Abdullah have attributed their success or commitment to their faiths. Because of their strong beliefs in a higher power, religious athletes may be better able to handle the stress of training, the downs of losing and injury.
Also, common characteristics help teams bond and a team with members who have a shared love of their sports as well as a shared faith have more reasons over which they can bond.
However, being religious does not automatically mean an athlete will be more morally developed or a non religious athlete will be amoral.
In the past, developmentalists believed that human intelligence is Static, whereas now it is commonly understood that intelligence is malleable.
Human intelligence:
- The capacity to learn from experience, adapt to novel circumstances, comprehend and manage abstract concepts, and apply information to influence one's surroundings are all components of human intelligence.
- Humans are cognitively capable of learning, forming concepts, understanding, applying logic and reason, as well as the capacities to recognize patterns, plan, innovate, solve problems, make decisions, retain information, and use language to communicate. These abilities are all a part of intelligence.
- Humans are often regarded as the most intellectual species on the planet; humans possess large brains that are superior to those of other animals in terms of processing speed and cognitive ability. In actuality, during millions of years of evolution, humans have demonstrated a tremendous growth in brain size and intelligence.
Learn more about human intelligence here brainly.com/question/16543469
#SPJ4
The answer is Self-understanding. Erikson's picture of early adolescence the youthful youngsters obviously has started to create self-comprehension, which is simply the portrayal, the substance, and substance of self-originations.
Esmeralda fell of her skateboard and needed help. she would be least likely to get immediate help if her accident happened at a busy interaction.
According to a social psychological hypothesis known as the "bystander effect" or "bystander apathy," people are less inclined to assist a victim when other people are around. Since it was first introduced in 1964, a great deal of study, primarily in the lab, has concentrated on a wide range of topics, including the number of bystanders, ambiguity, group cohesion, and the dispersion of blame that supports mutual denial. However, if a group is required to complete the task, each member will have a weak sense of responsibility and will frequently shrink back in the face of difficulties or responsibilities. If a single individual is asked to complete the task alone, the sense of responsibility will be strong, and there will be a positive response.
To learn more about bystander effect click here:
brainly.com/question/3156006
#SPJ9
Directoffered some rights to the local
populationplaced heavy restrictions on the
local populationallowed the local population to
participate in governmentgave the local population no rights
Indirect Control
did not give the local population
positions in governmentforced the local population to adapt
<span>to European culture</span>