Brutus argues that in a republic, “the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar…if not, there will be
a constant clashing of opinions and the representatives of one part will be constantly striving against the other.” Should a republic be made up of a small group of like-minded people? Or, is diversity of opinion beneficial to the success of a federal government? Explain.
Diversity important in such a case that you have a little gathering of individuals who concur on the majority of similar things, at that point you won't get alternate points of view and normally things will go unaltered on the off chance that they don't think about the issue as something that influences them.
Diversity, including a decent variety of sexual orientation, religion, and ethnicity, has been appealed to enhance maintenance and lessen the expenses related to representative turnover. In a differing working environment, representatives are more probable to stay faithful when they feel regarded and esteemed for their exceptional commitment.
Diverse opinions are necessary becuase if you have a small group of people who agree on all of the same things, then you won't get different perspectives and typically things will go unchanged if they don't think of the problem as something that affects them.
Chemical used is the main independent variable. Cell growth was the dependent variable or response variable. The cell type and dose are both being tested within the experiment leaving lab technician.
That is The Board of Geographical Names. It was established in the late nineteenth century and is operated by the U.S. Geological Survey. They are the final arbiter of names on U.S. maps.
