1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
7

As the civil war dragged on why was the north in better shape to win than the south?

History
2 answers:
larisa [96]3 years ago
7 0
I  believe that it was because the north were much prepared.
gregori [183]3 years ago
6 0
The north had a bigger amount of people fighting for them ( army ) than the south did leading to an easier advantage of winning.
You might be interested in
What do you think the relationship between the great migration and the Harlem renaissance might be?
natka813 [3]

Answer:  can i have brainly please

Explanation:

the Harlem renaissance was a time when African Americans were trying to come out from their shadows and do more things and get away from racism so the great migration was the time when African Americans were migrating north to get away from it all and make a better life.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the results of the fighting at Lexington & Concord?
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

The Battles of Lexington and Concord took a toll on both sides. For the colonists, 49 were killed, 39 were wounded, and five were missing. For the British, 73 were killed, 174 were wounded, and 26 were missing. ... The battles also constituted the first military conflicts of the American Revolution.

Explanation:

hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Did the Puritins allow people to practice any religion?
Hatshy [7]
Yes but it was a catholic practice i think
3 0
4 years ago
Mark the consequence if it is intentional.
Bond [772]
The best option from the list would be "<span>Millions of people in Africa are kidnapped by African slave traders and sold to European sugarcane planters in the Caribbean," since the Europeans depended on this labor in order to extract numerous materials. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Some have argued that there really was very little difference in the use of atomic bombs and conventional bombs against Japan. D
True [87]

Answer:

Disagree. The sheer amount of force that an atomic bomb had was insane. Conventonial bombs would NOT have killed as many innocents.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the state constitutions important to the writing of the U.S. Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • The failure of foreign banks such as the Kredit-Anstalt Bank during the early 1930s can be partially attributed to the Smoot-Haw
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains a feature of autocracies? A. Citizens control the military. B. One person or a small group of peop
    12·2 answers
  • Renaissance art was strongly influenced by ancient Greek and Roman
    10·2 answers
  • Why did isis attack pairs
    15·1 answer
  • In Greek mythology who was the queen of the Olympians and married to Zeus
    15·2 answers
  • Which diagram accurately reflects how a historical society influenced the
    12·1 answer
  • How were religious services different in the First Great Awakening than in previous generations?
    6·1 answer
  • what was the main effect of the sharecropping system? a) Land was given to freed slaves for their use. b) Sales of crops more th
    12·1 answer
  • Which term best describes government in Russia after the Communists took power?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!