Answer:
take the first sandwitch and split it in half then then take the second one and do the same
Explanation:
each get half and the remaining one split it in three
the they can all share equally.........
<h2>hope i helped dear </h2>
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
In "Rhinoceros," what does the forceful entrance of the rhinoceros in the entrance most likely foreshadow?
Answer: I believe that the entrance of the rhinoceros in the entrance most likely foreshadows the idea of what the rhinoceros. This quickly spread as the second one kills a cat. By the time people realize everyone starts turning into a rhinoceros themselves. They represent fascism tyranny in the form of an epidemic. The only one in the end of this story who remains unchanged.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Answer:
When a progressive tense is used in the independent clause, the dependent clause typically uses the simple past tense.
Explanation:
This is an article that introduces us to the famous Freud's theory that it is our unconscious mind that controls our actions, needs and behaviour and characteristics. Also, he suggests that our unconsciousness consists of three parts: id, ego and super-ego, each with its distinctive features.
The section "Balancing Act" contributes to this central idea by stating that all three parts need to be in a balance in order for one to have happy and mentally healthy life, thus deepening the concept of id, ego and super-ego being unbreakably connected, rather then three independent parts.
Consequentially, if any of the three parts prevails the others, it will lead to mental and emotional problems.
