Answer:
be indifferent between the two meals
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction received from consuming an additional unit of a good or service. Marginal utility is the additional utility derived from consuming one more unit of a good. the consumption decision is to consume more units of a good that gives the higher utility per good.
Marginal utility per good = marginal utility / price of the good
Whopper combo meal = 15 / 3 = 5
a meal at the Embassy Suites = 145 / 29 = 5
both meals have the same marginal utility of 5. She would be indifferent between consuming the two meals
Answer:
25.55 days
Explanation:
first we must calculate the accounts receivable turnover ratio = net sales / average accounts receivable
net sales = $1,000,000
average accounts receivable ($80,000 + $60,000) / 2 = $70,000
accounts receivable turnover ratio = $1,000,000 / $70,000 = 14.286
average collection period = 365 days / accounts receivable turnover ratio = 365 / 14.286 = 25.55 days
The spending that would occur during the third round of spending if the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) was 0.6 will be $420 billion.
- Increase in expenditure = $700 billion.
- Marginal propensity to consume = 0.6
The amount of spending based on the information given will be:
= 0.6 × $700 billion
= $420 billion.
Therefore, the correct option is $420 billion.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/17012549
Answer: "The rise in the price of a pair of running shoes will increase the supply of running shoes".
This statement is <u><em> false</em></u> because <em><u>a decrease in demand for running shoes does not increase the price of a pair of running shoes and an increase in the price of a pair of running shoes does not increase the supply of running shoes. </u></em>
This occurs as the price of a pair of running shoes increases,therefore decreasing the demand and thus the supply will not increase.
Answer:
In 2009, the U.S. government imposed a 35% tariff on tires imported from China. (The numbers and equations used here are simplified based on the results of a much more complicated model.) Demand is given by QD = 105 − 1.5P where QD is in millions of tires per year. Supply is QS = 1.5873P − 15.87.
Explanation:
