1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Umnica [9.8K]
3 years ago
5

Laura is an investor and a limited partner in a limited partnership. Two years after she becomes a limited partner, Laura thinks

that the general partners are not doing a very good job managing the affairs of the limited partnership and participates in the management of the limited partnership. While she is participating in management, a bank loans $1 million to the limited partnership, believing that Laura is a general partner. If the limited partnership defaults on the $1 million loan, which of the following holds well?
A. Laura has unlimited personal liability as a limited partner.
B. Laura is personally liable as the bank, in good faith, thought she is a general partner.
C. Laura's liability is restricted to the value of her capital investment in the partnership.
D. Laura is not personally liable as she is a limited partner on paper.
Business
1 answer:
erik [133]3 years ago
8 0

Answer

Option B. Laura is personally liable as the bank, in good faith, thought she is a general partner

Explanation:

Limited Partnership (LP)

This is Business entity that exists in line with state statutes that gives limited liability to some of its members who called limited partners.

RULPA

This is simply called Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. It is the model for Limited Partnership legislation in most states.

Limited Partner

This is a part or member of a limited partnership.it is that individual who is not involved in controlling the business and whose liability is limited to amount invested in the business.

General Partner

It is simply a member in a limited (or general) partnership who controls the business and has unlimited personal liability.

In the above scenario, Laura will be taken as a general partner and will be held personally accountable or liable for the loan, and also along with the general partners of the limited partnership.The rule of RULPA gives the right for a limited partner to be involved in the management of the partnership’s affairs and not losing the limited liability if the limited partner has been formally employed by the partnership to be an executive of the partnership.

You might be interested in
A director violates the corporate opportunity doctrine if he or she competes with the corporation, unless the disinterested dire
DIA [1.3K]

The given statement " A director violates the corporate opportunity doctrine if he or she competes with the corporation, unless the disinterested directors approve of the director's actions " is TRUE

Explanation:

A business opportunity applies to any business opportunity that a client may gain.

The Corporate Opportunity law controls the moral responsibility of directors, managers and managing stockholders in an organisation, with loyalty responsibilities, not to misuse such incentives without first offering to the corporate board the right to reject the opportunity on behalf of the company.

When these actions are broken and a director of the company takes the chance, then the trustee has abused his obligation to be trustworthy and will be able to maintain a constructive trust with the proceeds arising from the incorrect transaction.

8 0
3 years ago
A consumer makes purchases of an existing product X such that the marginal utility is 10 and the price is $5. The consumer also
Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer:

Increase the consumption of product Y and decrease the consumption of product X.

Explanation:

Utility-maximizing rule states that a consumer is maximizing its utility at a point where the marginal utility per dollar spent equal for both the products.

Marginal utility per dollar for Product X:

\frac{MU_X}{P_X}=\frac{10}{5}

= 2 utils per dollar

Marginal utility per dollar for Product Y:

\frac{MU_Y}{P_Y}=\frac{8}{1}

= 8 utils per dollar

Here, the utility-maximizing rule suggests that this consumer should consume more of product Y and less of product X.

4 0
4 years ago
The accounts of Melissa Manufacturing showed the following balances at the beginning of December: Account Debit Raw Materials In
maw [93]

Answer:

$120,000

Explanation:

Calculation to determine What should be the balance in the Work-in-Process Inventory following these transactions

Beginning balance in WIP $75,000

Add: Direct materials transferred $39,000

Direct factory labor cost $6,000

Ending balance $120,000

($75,000+$39,000+$6,000)

Therefore What should be the balance in the Work-in-Process Inventory following these transactions is $120,000

5 0
3 years ago
The following transactions pertain to the operations of Ewing company for year 2.
Archy [21]

Answer:

ending cash balance                    62,000

Explanation:

<u>operating activities:</u>

services on cash       8,000

collected from AR    51,000

paid to supplies     (22,000)

rent paid                   (6,500)

supplies paid            (1,200)

cash generated from operating: 29,300

<u />

<u>financing activities:</u>

issuance of stock      30,000

cash dividends paid   (4,000)

cash generated from financing: 26,000

cash generated during the year: 55,300

beginning cash balance            <u>     6, 700 </u>

ending cash balance                    62,000

7 0
4 years ago
If you fire Julio from his job after making one mistake but did not fire John for making the same mistake several times, you hav
ahrayia [7]

In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice

Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.

According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.

In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.

Read more about this here

<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By switching its sales agents to a sales neutral profit commission, the firm is trying to convince the agents a. ​Improve their
    15·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply. Read the following paragraph. Select each of the ways Max was financially responsible. Max needed to make
    7·2 answers
  • Matty Kim an accountant for vernitron, earned $111,000 from January to June. In July, Matty earned $20,000. Assume a tax rate of
    5·1 answer
  • A project with a life of one year has an accounting break-even point of 2,962 units. The fixed costs are $46,308 and the depreci
    9·1 answer
  • Under the Uniform Securities Act, the threshold where a State-registered adviser is considered to have taken custody of client f
    6·1 answer
  • Data concerning Farm Corporation's single product appear below: Selling price per unit $ 320.00 Variable expense per unit $ 76.8
    13·1 answer
  • __________This import tax was meant to replace the earlier "Tariff of Abominations", but it was widely disliked by southern merc
    6·1 answer
  • Balmforth Products, Inc. makes and sells a single product called a Bik. It takes three yards of Material A to make one Bik. Budg
    7·1 answer
  • : When you go looking for a job after graduation, what sources do you expect to use? Why?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the definition of customer service?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!