Supreme court justices, once confirmed, have their positions for life. So the Supreme Ct is the answer for G.
Answer:
During many decades of the 19th century Industrial Revolution, workers conditions were terrible and often inhuman. They were exploited by factory owners. They worked too long, often for 15-20 hours per day; received miserable salaries; worked and lived in unsanitary conditions; they and their families were malnourished and in poor health. This situation affected women, as well as men and children. In the case of women, they had an additional problem which was the fact that they did not have enought time to take cafe of their children, as they had to spend so many hours outside home working in factories.
Explanation:
Thomas Jefferson and his party believed in an agrarian community. One in which the economy was dependent on crops, his views were that if the states provided crops like cotton to Britain then Britain in exchange would give them goods such as textiles. This worked for a period of time because England had just developed the cotton gin so they needed cotton in order to produce clothing.
Alexander Hamilton rather believed in a strong federal government dependent on industries. He thought the creation of a national debt would help the US because it would develop good credit with other nations which would give the US good standing to receive loans. Hamilton even founded the first national Bank of America. His view on government was more centralized then what Jeffersonians wanted. Jeffersonians were the ones who believed firmly in state rights and limited federal interference. This cause arguments between the two parties.
The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.
Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.
