Answer:
entire initial investment will not be recovered.
Explanation:
Payback period is one of the methods used in capital budgeting.
Payback period calculates how long it takes for the amount invested in a project to be recovered from its cummulative cash flows.
For example, if a project costs $360 and the cash flow each year for its 6 years useful life is $120. The amount invested would be gotten back from the cummulative cash flow in 3 years.
But if a project costs $360 and the cash flow each year for its 2 years useful life is $120. The amount invested would never be gotten back the cummulative cash flow. Therefore, the entire investment amount will never be entirely recovered.
The project will always not be profitable
I hope my answer helps you.
Based solely on the ending cash b as landed amount provided, it a year over year decrease of 45,000.
Answer:
If Mo pays cash, the cost of the purchase will be $140.
If Mo uses the credit card and pays the full balance during the billing cycle, the cost of the purchase will be $135.80.
Explanation:
If Mo pays cash, it implies that she does not get the 3% discount she is entitled to, with the use of her credit card. Therefore, she will bear the full cost. However, if she uses the credit card, the discount is $4.20 ($1540 * 97%) and she will pay only $135.80 as the discounted price of the electronic reader.
Answer:
b) $1,950,000
Explanation:
Value of gift cards redeemed with those whose date of redemption has passed, will both have the amount to revenue out of $2,000,000 of the gift cards sold.
Total gift card revenue to be recognized in 2016 = $1,800,000 + $150,000
Total gift card revenue to be recognized in 2016 = $1,950,000
Answer:
Morally, how about we start with business morals. Extensively business morals spin around progressively the estimation of the business to investors or partners (contingent upon the type of private enterprise). In the event that redistributing work diminishes costs and converts into expanded benefits for the organization, that is sufficient to consider it in accordance with the all-encompassing order of the business whether or not there is a decrease in cost for the buyer.
Is it morally wrong to use innovative advances to build creation productivity when request in a market is generally inelastic? Cultivating used to be 40% of American employments. Presently it's generally 2% but then out creation has developed.
Long haul the pulverization of a class of business is regularly counterbalanced by the formation of another classification the requires increasingly psychological assets. Actually, whole new enterprises can be made. So it is additionally not so much exact to restrict your view to simply the individuals who are dislodged from their occupations. It is completely conceivable that the net impact on the economy is sure.
Be that as it may, again morals are increasingly emotional and have to do with the type of private enterprise to which one buys in, political way of thinking, and perspective on social duty of business.
