Hi I don’t know what you are doing but I want a brainliest If it is possible
Answer:
All of the above are true.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns was first formulated by the classic economist David Ricardo. It presupposes a technical relationship between input and output, which is not scientifically demonstrable but only empirically. In practice, in a generic production system, at any contribution of any factor, that is, land, labor, capital, machines, etc. there is no proportionally increasing production increase.
Normally it is assumed that the law does not always come into operation but only when the variable input exceeds a certain threshold. For example, the increase of workers on an assembly line certainly allows a proportional increase in production, but only until the entire system begins to suffer from malfunctions due to logistics or work organization, precisely because of the its getting bigger. Large industrial plants have shown that they must be divided into sections, however coordinated, precisely because of the decreasing returns. This is because the increase in the number of workers and the mass of the plants does not correspond to a consequent increase in production.
Answer:
The portfolio standard deviation is 14.82%
Explanation:
The portfolio standard deviation would be calculated by finding out the variance of the portfolio and taking the square root of it.
Variance of the portfolio = [(1 - .50)
x 0.25
] + [0.50
x 0.16
] + [2 x (1 - 0.50) x 0.50 x 0.25 x 0.16 x 0]
= [0.25 x 0.0625] + [0.25 x 0.0256] + [0]
= 0.015625 + 0.0064
VarPort = 0.022025
Std DevPort = √0.022025
Std DevPort = 0.1482 = 14.82 percent
The answer is C. Replace workers with machine
It's common for a company to replace workers with maschines in order to do hard menial labour such as wrapping packages, cutting products, shaping the products, moving the raw material, etc. which could increase efficiency and lower wage levels at the same time
Emma's taxable property value should be $600,000 since her taxes will be based on the assessment not the appraisal and also because she gets the $50,000 tax reduction so therefore to reiterate she will be taxed on only the $600,000.