Initially, a defendant's case is at a trial court (Federal, State, Circuit Courts).
Then the case proceeds to the Court of Appeal before finally moving to the Supreme Court of the state or at the federal level.
But it is not true that all cases must move to the Supreme Court when the defendant appeals. The movement to the highest court requires the acceptance of the defendant's argument and the merit of each case.
Thus, the defendant's case can move from a <em>trial court,</em><em> an </em><em>appeals court,</em><em> and then to the </em><em>supreme court.</em>
Learn more: brainly.com/question/11640159
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, you can hit them back as you have ‘Right to Private Defense’ provided there is a proportionality of force. The right to private defense is the right to protect oneself from the unlawful aggression of others. It is based on the cardinal principle that it is the first duty of a man to help him even by taking the law into his own hand.
Answer:
the body
Explanation:
The Declaration of Independence is the document referring to the time when the US was founded, we can consider this document as the founding document of the country, as through it the country can completely detach itself from British rule. This statement was approved by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, and has in its text the genius of Thomas Jefferson.
Regarding the structural declaration of independence, we can state that the body of the declaration acts as an implicit plan of action, since the laws and practices discussed therein were written in a proposition but not formally expressed; not manifestly stated and subject to change.
Answer: State Law vs Federal Law
For a very brief explanation, federally the "grass" is illegal. But in some states, it's legal for either recreational and medical use. According to Cornell law, "Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Generally, an overarching national government is responsible for broader governance of larger territorial areas, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and cities govern the issues of local concern." In the case of the "grass" the federal government has the broad rule of outlawing it, but the federal government makes no effort to enforce the federal rule, as the DOJ would not take up the case of simple possession. So it's left up to the states.
