Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Explanation:
<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>
Answer:
Correct Answer:
A. "It may be O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the good you produce outweighs the harm caused by the violation."
Explanation:
<u><em>Utilitarian theory</em></u><em> is a moral theory whereby an individual views the morality of an action being done as either good or bad based on the effect it would have. For example, is the dropping of bomb in an area in the cause of war. </em>
This could be viewed by some people as morally right since it will kill people but at same time stop the ongoing war rather than a situation where the war continues on the long run.
