Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Computer keyboard shortcuts are a form of automation in that they allow you to complete an operating system or program task. For example, when you copy and paste text, you can duplicate text in multiple places without having to type the text.
Answer: D
An idiom is a funny saying/phrase. It does not serve as any criminal law or military action. It doesn't mean a foolish person, but it is just an artistic style used in some texts.
Hope this helps you!
The British took retribution in opposition to native American international locations that fought at the facet of the French by way of reducing off their supplies and then forcibly compelling the tribes to obey the regulations of the brand new mother usa.
The warfare exacted a horrible toll on Indigenous people. One-0.33 of all Cherokees and Seminoles in Indian Territory died from violence, starvation, and conflict-related infection. In spite of their sacrifice, American Indians would discover that their tribal lands were even less comfy after the war.
Native American Indians who were angered by means of the expansion of British colonies into their homelands aligned with the French during the conflict, even though a few, consisting of the Iroquois, affiliated with the British because of their frustration at France's authentic colonialism.
Learn more about native American here: brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ9
Answer:
All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or change existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.
Explanation:
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
