These two characters are not similar whatsoever. Eurymachus is a deceitful person, always scheming, thinking of plans how to enjoy himself and doesn't care about others. He even wanted to kill Odysseus' son Telemachus. He treats everyone with disrespect and is extremely arrogant. These are not adjectives that describe Odysseus, even though he did show arrogance when defeating the Cyclops.
I'd say it's false.
A poem has to follow a specific pattern, rhyme, scheme or meter to identify it's form.
So just going off of the way the poem looks on the page is not the true form.
Hope I could help <3
The golden dog ran under the porch
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The statement that it's a way to impress the interviewer with your expansive vocabulary is not a reason to <span>research and prepare some questions for the interviewer to answer. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.</span>
In my opinion, the second main argument in "The Human Drift" is that human wandering across the planet, back and forth, has always been fueled by fear, while motivated by the search of food (as the first argument says). It is a primal fear that, if you don't eat, you will end up in someone else's stomach. Here is a nice excerpt that illustrates this argument: "Dominated by fear, and by their very fear accelerating their development, these early ancestors of ours, suffering hunger-pangs very like the ones we experience to-day, drifted on, hunting and being hunted, eating and being eaten, wandering through thousand-year-long odysseys of screaming primordial savagery, until they left their skeletons in glacial gravels, some of them, and their bone-scratchings in cave-men's lairs."
