The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.
Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:
- There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
- Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
- Countries with a strong military can use their full power.
However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:
- Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
- The destruction of all civil society.
- Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
- Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
- Complete depletion of the country's resources.
- Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
- Closes the door to any peaceful solution.
There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.
Answer:
Transportation resources were legally segregated
Explanation:
Rosa parks was an American civil rights activist famous for her role in the Montgomery bus boycott. She is also called " The mother of the freedom" and " the first lady of civil rights"
She was jailed because she sat down and refused to give up her seat to a white passenger. By doing so she disobeyed an Alabama law which required black people to leave their seats to white people when the bus was full. Although she was not the fist person do so.
Answer:
Animals have been hurt by wind turbines, so the sites of wind farms have been carefully selected.
Explanation: i took the test and got it correct
I believe the last option is the correct one - <span>They were opposed to Article 10 that could infringe upon the United States’ right to declare war and expand its territories.
This particular Article meant that anyone could call America for assistance in times of war. Obviously, the US politicians were against such a decision, even though France and Britain wanted to sign it. In the end, nothing happened with this document.
</span>
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton is the answer
