Other assumptions associated with this question are as follows:
- One person can feed on 1 hen/day for a year
- 1 hen must east 25 grasshoppers /day
- the total mass of 1000 grasshoppers is 1kg
- 600 grasshoppers are needed to feed 1 human per day
Grasshoppers is represented as Gh.
The total amount needed to feed the hen per year is:
- If expressed in Kg, then it would be 9,125/1000 which is
- = 9.125Kg/annum.
So if the farmer chose to live on grasshoppers rather than on hens, the calculation is given as follows:
- (90 kg/1 hour) x (24 hours/1 day) x (1 person/ 600 Gh)
The amount of Grasshoppers required is given as follows;
If the farmer can gather 90 Gh in one hour then,
- The total amount of Gh per day is 90 x 24 = 2,160
- the total amount of Gh available in a year is 2160 x 365 = 788,400 Gh/Year
- If 600 grasshoppers are quired to feed the human per day, then we work backward
- The total amount of Gh available in a day is 788,400/365. This is equal to 2160 Gh
- The total amount of people this can feed is given as 2,160/600
- Which is equal to 3.6 persons.
Since humans or people cannot be divided into fractions like a measure of sugar or a measure of liquid, the answer is best left to the most approximate digit with it 4 Persons.
Learn more about Trophic Levels and food availability here:
brainly.com/question/2001301
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
This phenomenon best illustrates why intelligence tests need to be revised for predictive validity. The tests are taken initially and show high scores, then they are taken again and show even higher scores. This shows that the individuals are getting smarter. If the test continues to be taken without revision then the same results will continue since the individuals will continue to become smarter but the test will continue being the same. Therefore, becoming much easier for the participants every time. This ultimately leads to better and better scores.
Gideon was an unexperienced man in terms of the law. He was underprepared and did not defend himself well. Hope this helps you.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What was at stake between the competing candidates, especially Adams and Jackson was the reputation and legality of the United States election system.
We are talking about the controversial US election of 1824.
In this election, four candidates participated: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William Crawford. The election resulted very competitively, without a clear winner. In the end, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote. That is why the final result relied on the hands of the House of Representatives. Congress gave the final victory to Jhon Quincy Adams, and candidate Jackson accused the decision to be corrupted.
President Adams appointed Henry Clay as his Secretary of State and that made Andrew Jackson accuse this of a corruption action. The popular mane of this situation was known as the Corrupt Bargain.
The defense mechanisms is he employing to reduce his own guilt feelings is denial and hostility to those involve in drug abuse.
<h3>What are defense mechanism?</h3>
Defense mechanisms are known to be a kind of behaviors that people often use to separate themselves from any kind of unwanted or unpleasant situations, actions, or thoughts.
They are regarded as psychological strategies that can help people put distance between themselves and ill feelings, such as guilt.
Learn more about defense mechanism from
brainly.com/question/4523765