Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
Answer:
I wish I could help but I sure I saw a question like this on khan academy. you can try there
Answer:
read below
Explanation:
The answers are close so, #1 would not make much sense. Coasts are exactly where land and water meet so... #2 I guess that would also make sense since water deposits sediments and it's where land meets water. #3, um, coasts won't be exactly flat if sediments from water are brought and it's where water and land meet, so it can't be #3. It won't be #4 since the coasts are not very steep.
I would say #2 because sediments from the shelf are what keep the coast complete. You could say #3 but i honestly don't know what else to say.
This question is impossible for us to answer because we don't have the parallelogram to see.
Do you have any options for this question or no?
