Answer:
Nativist anti-immigrant legislation was similar to Jim Crow laws targetting non-white populations.
Explanation:
The cartoon in the picture is a very witty take on Nativist anti-immigrant laws that were enacted in the United States after WWI.
The reason is that it compares one of its measures: literacy tests, with Jim Crow laws, which also included literacy tests for people in order to be able to vote, a measure that targeted black people and poor white people, who at the time had very low literacy levels. This policy was designed to effectively keep black and poor white people from voting, a phenomenon that is known as disenfranchisement.
Literacy tests for immigrants had a similar effect, since many of U.S. potential immigrants at the time came from non-english speaking countries like Italy, Poland or China, and this literacy tests were obviously made in English.
You didn't provide choices, but the probable answer is that <em>Marbury v. Madison</em> established the Supreme Court's right of judicial review -- the ability to declare a law or executive action unconstitutional.
More detail:
- Judicial review refers to the courts' ability to review any law to see if it violates any existing law or any statute of a state constitution or the US Constitution. On the federal level, Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review, to strike down a law as unconstitutional.
- It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
They faced challenges when population was a problem for small and big states for how many delagates to get .
they wanted slaves to count as population, a problem too
and trading was an issue too
Answer:
hello!
Explanation:
MacArthur received orders from Washington directing him to Australia.
The Australian government was in large part responsible for MacArthur's departure from the Philippines. Don't know who this McCarther fellow is but the name of the American Army commander in the Philippines in December 1941 was Douglas MacArthur and he didn't abandon American troops
Answer:
grievances concerning the ongoing War of 1812 and the political problems arising from the federal government's increasing power.
Explanation:
