What were the roles of the leaders during the Civil War?

History

1 answer:

Kazeer [188]3 years ago

6 0

Ulysses S Grant headed the union army. Robert Lee headed the southern army.

Explanation:

Eleven south states disaffiliated from the union and were headed by Jefferson Davis. Confederacy writhed and wriggled to attain the authentic status under the leadership of Jefferson Davis. He was the only president of the southern confederate states who appealed for peace during civil war in the senate in an expressive manner.

U S Grant was the commander in general who led the northern army during civil war and emerged to be triumphant against the confederacy. Robert Lee headed the southern army. Grant was also famous in the reconstruction of the south after civil war.

You might be interested in

What was an effect of the discovery of the New World in the late fifteenth century?

Elza [17]

There were many effects, but perhaps the most visible one is the Columbian exchange: the exchange of species, including plant, animal, also diseases such as viruses, on a global scale.

For example, potato plant was imported to Europe.

4 0

3 years ago

I have 5 minutes to answer

yuradex [85]

I think is the 1st option, hope that helps :)

3 0

3 years ago

although it seemed quite important in 1788,what amendment barring the quartering of soldiers in private homes.is outdated today

VMariaS [17]

3rd Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

5 0

3 years ago

What do special forces do that conventional forces do not?

lorasvet [3.4K]

Idk but I need to answer a question but you can Google it your welcome

4 0

3 years ago

did the korean war serve any purpose? was part or all of it just a mistake? what were the "results"? how much responsibility sho

Studentka2010 [4]

The Korean war had a purpose but it had largely failed.

Explanation:

Truman can and cannot be blamed for the war as he had formulated this policy of attacking in per preemptive measures to control the spread of communism that had plagued the US for so long.

At the same time the nature of the policy was such that it has led to the development of the US in certain senses.

So, as all things in history it is a two way thing and often based around the perspective one has of things.

The war itself was not a success in terms of containing communism as North Korea was out of grasp.

7 0

3 years ago