Answer: WHAT WAS THE SAME 1) reigning dynasty was Bourbon dynasty, 2) there was no democracy and democratic participation on political order (no elections), 3) society continued being not secularized (unity of trone and altar), 4) no free press (freedom of expression). "Declaration de l´homme et du citoyen" (preamble of all French constitutions) was not put in reality. WHAT WAS DIFFERENT: 1) power of dynasty was increasingly dependent on foreign countries, dynasty had weak support from the population, dynasty was put back on the basis of Vienna Congress (1814-1815), 2) French kings had to make concessions (limited monarchy), 3) there were three currents on the right-wing political spectre: - legistimistes (supporting absolute monarchy and Bourbon dynasty), - orleanistes (supporting constitutional monarchy of the house of Orleans), - napoleonistes (supporting house of Napoleon), - there was much less credibility of Bourbon dynasty.
Explanation:
The professional consequence
One of the goals in writing the prince was to win the favor of Lorenzo de Medici
The answer was South Africa.
Rhodes’ ambition was to create a railroad that would connect African colonies
directly to Cairo in Egypt. This was made during the colonial period. Though some parts were constructed, it missed
completion due to rivalry with other European colonial powers.
The Second Punic War was waged between Rome and Carthage between 218-201 BC and the First Punic War happened between 264 and 241 BC.
While the First Punic war was fought under the control of Sicily, the Second Punic War included confrontations between a bigger number of territories (Spain, Sicily, Sardinia, Italy and North Africa).
The First Punic War did not break the strength and influence of Carthage completely, however it dramatically empowered Rome. After The Second Punic War Rome became the hegemon of the Western Mediterranean, and Carthage lost its powerful position.
