1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRissso [65]
3 years ago
9

What is a person’s explanation for a past event known as?

History
2 answers:
MrRa [10]3 years ago
7 0

c Historical Interpretation

loris [4]3 years ago
6 0

Could be historical interpretation! Sounds like that is the most likely answer!
You might be interested in
how did the kennedy administration know that the soviet union was putting ballistic missiles in cuba?
Komok [63]
1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
3 0
3 years ago
Native Americans living on the eastern side of Washington would tend to develop their communities around this geographic feature
PIT_PIT [208]
C option is correct......
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Although President Wilson did NOT want to punish Germany, Great Britain and France did. They got their way. How was Germany puni
mash [69]
They had to reduce there army and they also had to pay for the repercussions of the war<span />
7 0
3 years ago
A free enterprise system provides individuals the opportunity to make their own economic decisions without restrictions from the
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

the free enterprise system

Explanation:

If an essay were written based on the statements presented in the question above, that essay would have the topic "the free enterprise system". This is because the author of the essay would show arguments, elements and factors that make him agree or disagree with the adoption of this type of commercial system, also showing the advantages and disadvantages of adopting it or not.

For this, the author of the essay should address statements that revolve around the free enterprise system. As we know, the essay topic is one that allows arguments to revolve around their concepts. For this reason, we can say that the free enterprise system would be the topic.

8 0
3 years ago
2. Assume that Jacob spent $20,000 of his disposable income of $30,000
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Jacob's consumption increased by <u>$12,000</u>.

<h3>What is the marginal propensity to consume?</h3>

The marginal propensity to consume is defined as the proportion of an increase in income that a consumer consumes instead of saving.

<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>

Amount of disposal income in 2019 = $30,000

Amount of consumption in 2019 = $20,000

Increased disposal income = $40,000

Marginal propensity to consume = 0.8

Increase in consumption = $12,000 ($40,000 x 0.8 - $20,000)

Thus, Jacob's consumption increased by <u>$12,000</u>.

Learn more about marginal propensity to consume at brainly.com/question/17930875

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Against which of these groups of Cesar Chavez organize a boycott to protest unfair conditions for migrant workers
    13·2 answers
  • According to Pericles, how is Athens different from other Greek city-states
    10·2 answers
  • How did feudalism in the middle ages make life more secure?
    6·1 answer
  • What did Johnson do to improve Education
    7·2 answers
  • Which idea did the enlightenment thinkers lead the founding fathers to believe?
    10·1 answer
  • In the following examples, who is experiencing downward social mobility in the United States?
    5·1 answer
  • In which type of economy would consumers have the most choices of products to buy?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE
    13·1 answer
  • What are two reasons why the Cherokee were fearful of moving to the new lands?
    12·2 answers
  • 5. Which of the following statements would most likely be uttered by a Patriot?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!