As the products go on the market, the limitations in the induction cause them to be relatively homogeneous, however, over time, technological advances, product positioning, consumer needs and profits allow the market to lose homogeneity, especially those products that are related to very subjective and diverse criteria such as aesthetics or happiness.
In this case, what is shown in the cell phone market is the variation in the offer that occurred over time.
Answer
The history of the cell phone demonstrates that a. <em>Markets evolve toward greater heterogeneity over time.</em>
An information memorandum is very vital for a business because its gives the potential buyers an impression of your business before they meet physically or online with the company.
<h3>What is an
information memorandum?</h3>
Let understand that the I.M. refers to an information memorandum.
An information memorandum refers to sales memorandum which is document produced prior to selling the business or opening of pitch to any prospective buyers.
In conclusion, an information memorandum is very vital for a business because its gives the potential buyers an impression of your business before they meet physically or online with the company.
Read more about information memorandum
<em>brainly.com/question/3352783</em>
Answer:
Th answer is true
Explanation:
Unethical behavior is doing what is not doing the right thing at the workplace.
Answer:
Data for Question
<u>Debt</u> <u>Book Equity</u> <u>Market Equity</u> <u>Operating Income</u> <u>Interest Expense</u>
Firm A
500 300 400 100 50
Firm B
80 35 40 8 7
1.
Market debt-to-equity ratio = Debt of Firm / Market Equity
Firm A = 500 /400 = 1.25
Firm B = 80 / 40 = 2
2.
Book debt-to-equity ratio = Debt of Firm / Book Equity
Firm A = 500 /300 = 1.67
Firm B = 80 / 35 = 2.29
3.
Interest coverage ratio = Operating Income / Interest Expense
Firm A = 100 /50 = 2
Firm B = 8 / 7 = 1.14
4.
Firm B will have more difficulty meeting its debt obligations because it has higher debt equity ratio and lower interest coverage ratio than Firm A.
Answer:
This proposition isn't socially alluring. On the off chance that regular monopolists are permitted to decide their benefit amplifying yields and costs, at that point the yield of the common monopolist would in any case be at the problematic level where cost surpasses minor expense, demonstrating an under-designation of assets to the item.
It would be progressively alluring to constrain the normal monopolist to charge a value equivalent to minor cost and sponsor any misfortunes. Reasonable return valuing, that is, setting value equivalent to Average Total Cost would be an improvement over this proposition. The imposing business model firm could gain ordinary benefit by settling on reasonable return valuing proposition.
