The main reason why the colonists wanted to break away from Great Britain was "taxation without representation." Great Britain were taxing the colonists, through things like the Stamp Act, and the colonists felt like this was unfair. They did not get a say in what they were being taxed on and how much it was. They had no representation in British Parliament and had no way to make these decisions, so they felt it was unfair to be taxed. This made the colonists end up boycotting the products that were being taxed, leaving Great Britain with not as much money to pay war debts. Another reason was Great Britain sometimes made large armies stay with the colonists, who were normally armed. Great Britain then made the colonists provide housing for them, along with cooking, and even paying for them.
Answer:
The Sikhs become a Martial Sect ever since the death of Guru Har Krishan causing the Sikhs to lose trust in different communities.
Explanation:
Sikh communities came together during the period of Guru Har Krishans death and some coronation. With some sects of Sikhism they believe in an lineage of Gurus or believe in following a living guru. The main religions of the area at the time were Hinduism and Islam. The Sikh faith began around 1500 CE, when Guru Nanak began teaching a faith that was quite distinct from Hinduism and Islam. The different beliefs all happened because of a different teacher. I believe that the Sikhs began to hate the muslims because of their different beliefs.
Answer:
They had a matrilineal kinship system.
Explanation:
The Natchez people are one of the many tribes considered to be native Americans.
Aside from the fact that Natchez people speak different native languages that are yet to be associated with other native Americans, they are also known for having a unique social system of nobility classes and exogamous marriage practices.
The Natchez people is a highly based matrilineal kinship society, with adequacy in reckoning along female lines.
The assembly line would be my first choice.
The reaction of President Johnson to the Gulf of Tonkin incident did indeed show a monolithic view of Communism because he believed that Communism was dangerous.
<h3>What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?</h3>
This was an event in 1964 when it was said that North Vietnamese navy boats attacked American naval destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.
The North Vietnamese were Communists and Johnson responded by increasing U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
This shows a rigid view of Communism because Johnson thought that it would be right to go after Communists in Vietnam because all Communists were dangerous.
Find out more on the Gulf of Tonkin incident at brainly.com/question/15593184.
#SPJ1
