1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
13

Do you think the fall of the Western Roman Empire could have been avoided? Explain your answer.

History
1 answer:
DochEvi [55]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes

The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

You might be interested in
Why is Leo Tolstoy important ?
anastassius [24]

he wrote his first novel war and peace  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plesssee hellpppppppp
Aneli [31]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

your welcome

6 0
3 years ago
Which of Canada's Atlantic Provinces has jurisdiction over mainly uninhabited Labrador?
Tanzania [10]
It would be Canada's Atlantic Province of "Newfoundland" that has jurisdiction over mainly uninhabited Labrador, due mostly to the proximity of Labrador to Newfoundland relative to other bodies of land. 
3 0
3 years ago
What is a push factor?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

b

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree w/ Cortes decision to burn the ships? Explain
Nataliya [291]

Hernan Cortes (1485-1547) was a Spanish colonizer and conqueror, who leaded the conquest of the Mexican territories, that started in 1519 with the occupation of Veracruz. The tales about the sacking of the Mexican capital, Tenochtitlan, are still legendary nowadays.

After the takeover of Veracruz, Cortes gave the order of sinking his own ships (it was thought they were burnt, but nowadays that hypothesis is being questioned). Anyway, he destroyed his ships on purpouse to force his men to go forward and conquer the New World, both in the militar and spiritual (goal of spreading the Christian religion) dimensions.

  • Agreement with his decision: of course it is an incredibly effective manner of ensuring that his men would be motivated to conquer the territory, mainly because they did not have an alternative choice. They had to become rulers there or be lost in the middle of unknown lands. It can be claimed how the ultimate goal justifies the means.
  • Disagreement with the decision: it can be argued how unethical is that he prevented his men from deciding if they wanted to participate or not on the mission. He eliminated the choice.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • James Oglethorpe helped defend Georgia from an invasion by
    13·1 answer
  • Which early civilization built towering ziggurats and kept records in cuneiform?
    12·1 answer
  • Factories and mills in the early nineteenth century employed woman and children as well as men. Which statements are true about
    5·2 answers
  • How did the aztecs maintain power in the empire?
    9·1 answer
  • What argument did Andrew Jackson use to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision?
    5·1 answer
  • Which was not an invention that fueled the Industrial Revolution?spinning jenny
    9·1 answer
  • What government policies helped the economy recovery from postwar recession
    9·1 answer
  • Party nominees are chosen at nominating__
    5·1 answer
  • ANSWER THIS ASAP!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which term best completes the title of the diagram?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!