All categories

3 years ago

The jewerly store has a ring with a retail price of $372.50 it is on sale for 60% off the retail price what is the discount

Mathematics

2 answers:

zepelin [54]3 years ago

8 0

The discount of the ring would be 60% x 372.50 = 223.50$ is the discount.

Alja [10]3 years ago

5 0

149 just divide 60% from 372.50

You might be interested in

How many 1 1/2 liter bottles of water does it take to fill a 16 liter jug

timurjin [86]

11 bottles are needed to fill a 16 liter jug

Solution:

Given that, there is a 16 liter jug

There are $1\frac{1}{2}$ liters of bottle

Let us first convert the mixed fraction to improper fraction

Multiply the whole number part by the fraction's denominator.

Add that to the numerator.

Then write the result on top of the denominator.

$\rightarrow 1\frac{1}{2} = \frac{2 \times 1 + 1}{2} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5$

Thus the bottle is of 1.5 liter

We have to find the number of 1.5 liter bottles needed to fill 16 liter jug

Divide 16 by 1.5 to get result

$Number\ Of\ Bottles = \frac{16}{1.5} = 10.67 \approx11$

Thus 11 bottles are needed to fill a 16 liter jug

7 0

4 years ago

Is there a way to find all the factor pairs for a big number like 805 quickly

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

The complete list of factors for 805 are 1, 5, 7, 23, 35, 115, 161, and 805.

Step-by-step explanation:

A factor pair is a combination of two factors which can be multiplied together to equal 805. In proper math terms, the number 805 is called the product and the two numbers that can be multiplied together to equal it are called the factors.

In order to work out the factor pairs of 805 we need to first get all of the factors of 805. Once you have the list of all those factors we can pair them together to list out all of the factor pairs.

The complete list of factors for 805 are 1, 5, 7, 23, 35, 115, 161, and 805.

4 0

2 years ago

Which goes to this inequality x + 1 < 3

Serggg [28]

I got x < 2 for the inequality
Look at the image for more information

7 0

3 years ago

2 Here are two equations:

MatroZZZ [7]

a. (3,4) is only the solution to Equation 1.

(4, 2.5) is the solution to both equations

(5,5) is the solution to Equation 2

(3,2) is not the solution to any equation.

b. No, it is not possible to have more than one (x,y) pair that is solution to both equations

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Decide whether each neither of the equations,

i (3,4)

ii. (4,2.5)

ill. (5,5)

iv. (3,2)

To decide whether each point is solution to equations or not we will put the point in the equations

Equations are:

Equation 1: 6x + 4y = 34

Equation 2: 5x – 2y = 15

i (3,4)

Putting in Equation 1:

$6(3) + 4(4) = 34\\18+16=34\\34=34\\$

Putting in Equation 2:

$5(3) - 2(4) = 15\\15-8 = 15\\7\neq 15$

ii. (4,2.5)

Putting in Equation 1:

$6(4) + 4(2.5) = 34\\24+10=34\\34=34\\$

Putting in Equation 2:

$5(4) - 2(2.5) = 15\\20-5 = 15\\15=15$

ill. (5,5)

$6(5) + 4(5) = 34\\30+20=34\\50\neq 34$

Putting in Equation 2:

$5(5) - 2(5) = 15\\25-10 = 15\\15=15$

iv. (3,2)

$6(3) + 4(2) = 34\\18+8=34\\26\neq 34$

Putting in Equation 2:

$5(3) - 2(2) = 15\\15-4 = 15\\11\neq 15$

Hence,

(3,4) is only the solution to Equation 1.

(4, 2.5) is the solution to both equations

(5,5) is the solution to Equation 2

(3,2) is not the solution to any equation.

b. Is it possible to have more than one (x, y) pair that is a solution to both

equations?

The simultaneous linear equations' solution is the point on which the lines intersect. Two lines can intersect only on one point. So a linear system cannot have more than one point as a solution

So,

a. (3,4) is only the solution to Equation 1.

(4, 2.5) is the solution to both equations

(5,5) is the solution to Equation 2

(3,2) is not the solution to any equation.

b. No, it is not possible to have more than one (x,y) pair that is solution to both equations

Keywords: Linear equations, Ordered pairs

Learn more about linear equations at:

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0

3 years ago

A farmer has 7 3/4 rows of radishes in one field, 4 3/4 rows of radishes in another field, and 6 1/4 rows of radishes in a third

Gala2k [10]

Answer:

A. 18 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

It is convenient to rearrange the sum to make it easier to compute:

7 3/4 + 4 3/4 + 6 1/4 = (7 3/4) +(4 +6) +(3/4 +1/4)

= 7 3/4 + 10 + 1

= 18 3/4

The farmer has 18 3/4 rows of radishes altogether.

4 0

3 years ago