1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgen [1.6K]
3 years ago
5

Which was not a driving force behind imperialism? A Building wealth B Need for resources C Feeling of superiority D Desire to ed

ucate
History
1 answer:
alexira [117]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:D

Explanation:

Happy to help

You might be interested in
Under the articles of confederation the states did what with regard to economics
vodka [1.7K]
They would take money from the confederation government and invest it into policies that would boost production that could then be traded with foreigners, especially Europeans who wanted things like cotton and tobacco which were grown easily in the south.
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Apaches want the Spanish to build the San Saba Mission?
mart [117]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

D

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is this statement true or false? Akhenaten dismantled the ancient Egyptian religion by outlawing the worship of many gods and es
Kisachek [45]
The answer is true.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main cause of the turmoil that led up to the crusades?
Anon25 [30]
While the Crusades ultimately resulted in defeat for Europeans and a Muslim victory, many argue that they successfully extended the reach of Christianity and Western civilization. The Roman Catholic Church experienced an increase in wealth, and the power of the Pope was elevated after the Crusades ended.
Trade and transportation also improved throughout Europe as a result of the Crusades. The wars created a constant demand for supplies and transportation, which resulted in ship-building and the manufacturing of various supplies.



I hope this helps!!!!!!!!
7 0
3 years ago
Which European country gained control of the Suez Canal, even though it did not finance or participate in its construction? A. N
Finger [1]
D. Great Britain.

Source: My World History Textbook 
"Great Britain, which long opposed construction of the canal for fear that it might fall into enemy hands, benefited more than any other nation... Instead of making Egypt powerful and independent, the Suez Canal provided the excuse for a British invasion and occupation of that country."
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What else did the Indian Curio Rooms do in addition to selling art and crafts?
    11·1 answer
  • 10.
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the Allies encourage its continuation in Japan after the war?
    5·1 answer
  • RullILS
    5·2 answers
  • How many Union casualties were suffered at Chancellorsville?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the next logical step in the civil rights sequence above
    9·1 answer
  • What is Dwight Eisenhower’s legacy? And what is he remembered for?
    10·1 answer
  • Imagine you are an official in Muhamad bin
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes Andrew Jackson's unique campaign tactics during the election of 1828
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these statements represents a difference in the US and Texas constitutions?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!