Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. Marbury sued the new secretary of state, James Madison, in order to obtain his commission.
Explanation:
The Armistice of 11 November 1918 was the armistice signed at Le Francport near Compiègne that ended fighting on land, sea and air in World War I between the Allies and their last remaining opponent, Germany. Previous armistices had been agreed with Bulgaria, the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Also known as the Armistice of Compiègne from the place where it was signed at 5:45 a.m. by the Allied Supreme Commander, French Marshal Ferdinand Foch,[1] it came into force at 11:00 a.m. Paris time on 11 November 1918 and marked a victory for the Allies and a defeat for Germany, although not formally a surrender.
I believe the answer is: B.because of advances in science, medicine, technology, and the arts
During the hand civilization, China developed many advancement in use of herbs for medicinal purpose and adopted many technology from all across the world which increase their agricultural production capacity.
Their artworks were also developed to the point where it became a hot commodity among European nobles.
A state constitution is important to each individual state. However, a state constitution does not establish the different types of local governments in each city. That process must be made by the cities themselves.
Answer:
Thank yo for asking this...I was waiting for someone to ask me this.
EXPLANATION: This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes
