1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
3 years ago
6

What happen to Carthage in the third punic war

History
1 answer:
tiny-mole [99]3 years ago
5 0

In the Third Punic War, the Romans, led by Scipio the Younger, captured and destroyed the city of Carthage in 146 B.C., turning Africa into yet another province of the mighty Roman Empire.

You might be interested in
How does Allison's diving accident impact her feelings about this trip to go tubing?
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

B. It made her realize that life is too short not to embrace adventure, resulting in her being excited about the tubing trip.

Explanation:

I TOOK THE TEST ALREADY YOUR WELCOME

3 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
Hi please someone help me. the questions are below the story
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

Tecumseh was frustrated by the unexpected British-American armistice, which came at a time when his confederacy was attacking other American forts and were in need of British support.1.

2. British

3 not to about the last one

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
21. Why did the Aztecs use human sacrifice?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

21. ancient geographical region human sacrifices were viewed as a compensation for the sacrifices the gods had themselves created in making the globe. In Mesoamerican culture human sacrifices were viewed as a compensation for the sacrifices the gods had themselves created in making the globe and therefore the sun.

22. Lacking food and ravaged by pox sickness earlier introduced by one amongst the Spaniards, the Aztecs, currently junction rectifier by Cuauhtemoc, finally folded when ninety three days of resistance on the fateful day of thirteenth of August, 1521 CE. Tenochtitlan was raped and its monuments destroyed

23. Born around 1485, Cortez was a Spanish adventurer and human WHO defeated the Aztecs and claimed North American nation for Kingdom of Spain. He 1st set sail to the New World at the age of nineteen. Hernan Cortes later joined associate expedition to Cuba

24. The Incas created a road and road system in Republic of Peru with over eighteen,000 miles of roads.

The Incas had a sort of communicating system wherever relay messengers ran across rope bridges to deliver communications to subsequent team. ...

The Incas performed winning bone surgeries.

The Incas were the primary to cultivate the potato in Republic of Peru.

25. Pachacuti Inca Yupanqui was the ninth Sapa Inca of the dominion of town that he reworked into the Inca Empire. Most archaeologists currently believe that the known Inca website of Machu Picchu was designed as associate degree estate for Pachacuti.

7 0
3 years ago
which items on the list are primary sources a historian would use to understand why egyptian citizens participated in the politi
jolli1 [7]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>D. I and IV."</span>

<span>I. A letter written by a participant in the revolution
II. An article written by an American considering causes for the revolution
III. A historical text written about Middle Eastern revolutions over time
IV. A photograph of political protests during the revolution

A. I, III, and IV B. III only C. II and IV D. I and IV</span>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In what ways did the outside influences affect Nubia development?
    5·1 answer
  • How did Europe's role in global trade change after the European discovery of the americans?
    9·1 answer
  • Who did publisher henry luce credit with the provision of "the abundant life" in his blueprint for postwar prosperity, the ameri
    15·1 answer
  • Which two islands did the portuguse have their sugar plantions
    12·1 answer
  • To which branch of government does the power to interpret laws and apply the Constitution to the law belong?
    14·2 answers
  • Identify at least three achievements of Islamic thinkers, scientists, and artists in this space
    8·1 answer
  • What is your position on US involvement in world affairs? should the US intervene where it sees a need, or "mind its own busines
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about contributing to the common good?
    7·1 answer
  • Along with frontiersmen and city<br> workers, who generally supported<br> the Democratic party?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the name of the first satellite launched into orbit by russia in 1957?.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!