Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
marketing strategy
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the term that is being described is known as a marketing strategy. like mentioned in the question this is a business's overall game plan which they have designed in order to reach their target market and turn them into consumers of their products so that the company may increase profits. This is done by using many different factors such as price, promotion, and distribution system etc.
Answer:
The company’s overall net operating income would be $52,140
Explanation:
If the all divisions of the company are operates at break even level the overall net operating income of the company would be zero . because at break even level the sales value is equals to total variable cost plus total fixed cost if the company incurring any addition fixed cost then the over all net operating income will show loss of additional fixed incurred. The answer for the given question is the overall net operating income of the company would be ($52,140).
