The answers to your question is pilgrims
Um bts smooth like butter. My favorite band.
Answer: create a conducive environment where employees are emotional supported and their concerns are heard and rectified when necessary.
Explanation:
Customers are more likely to become motivated if they are cared for and receive the right support in an environment that is friendly and highly welcoming. They will mostly not feel like it's just a job but a career in which the have to give their best and that too will be recognised.
The best treatment that employees receive from their employer is likely to spread out to how they service the customers.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
The answer is hippocampus
